Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark

There is good reason why it was called a war of northern aggression.

Both sides committed treason if you stick strictly to the definition.

If Lincoln had not opposed the secession and offered a peaceful separation, there would be no reason to call anyone a traitor.


16 posted on 04/01/2014 1:17:58 AM PDT by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: AlmaKing
There is good reason why it was called a war of northern aggression.

I like to call it The War for Federal Supremacy.

Both sides committed treason if you stick strictly to the definition.

I notice the plurality in the definition of treason, namely them, in reference to the United States; the federal government is a single entity and it could therefore be argued that attacking it is not treason.

18 posted on 04/01/2014 1:58:30 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: AlmaKing

I dislike the term “civil war.” The South did not want to take over the government (example: English civil war), they wanted only to withdraw from the Union. I’d prefer the term “Second American Revolution.”


21 posted on 04/01/2014 3:18:22 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: AlmaKing
There is good reason why it was called a war of northern aggression.

Why is that?

26 posted on 04/01/2014 3:40:50 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson