[hoosiermama]

Iirc the first two cases that reached the SCOTUS were not dismissed but used the courts variation of tabled so that they may be revisited at the courts discretion. One of them had the state SoS as the defendants which would probably have not been ruled in our favor as there is no place that they are assigned the job to vet. Don’t remember who the other had as defendants. Both should be O and the individual in the democrat party who put him up for nomination

[3D-JOY]

At every level there have been excuses used to not hear the case. What will it be this time? No standing again or some other excuse? No one seems able to get to the point of a court ordered discovery before trial.

Paperwork is so buried and falsified I wonder if that will even help? I hope I live long enough to learn the truth.

[WildHighlander57]

Thanks for the ping, hoosiermama!

Pinging all y’all to this post!

Note:

The Vogt case is the one in which Ms Fuddy was named as a defendant. IIRC, it came out sometime around October last year.

And we know what happened next to Ms Fuddy.

[Kenny Bunk]

I has examined the BC as released by the WH web site.

Unfortunately, by the time I got my printer working it was dark. I can report that from 10 feet away, at dusk, without my glasses, it looked a lot like some sort of official document.

So I am in agreement with the Courts, The Congress, my state election officials, and Team Obama. Why don't you folks join us? The BC is plenty good enough!

[Seizethecarp]

“Iirc the first two cases that reached the SCOTUS were not dismissed but used the courts variation of tabled so that they may be revisited at the courts discretion.”

IIRC, SCOTUS in all prior eligibility related cases has allowed lower court rulings to stand by refusing to grant writ of certiorari without comment. I think there is virtually no probability that SCOTUS will take up Doug Vogt’s case.

The thread article is totally incorrect, IMO (IANAL)

“Douglas Vogt has lodged with the United States Supreme Court his compelling forensic evidence that the Birth Certificate of Barack Hussein Obama, II is indisputably a forgery.”

Vogt has asked SCOTUS to review the dismissal of his case by a lower court. No evidence can be “lodged” with any appellate court including SCOTUS. An appellate court only reviews application of the law to facts properly placed in evidence at the trial court. Vogt never got as far as even getting his evidence of BC forger into a trial court, which would have required full discovery under the FRE (federal rules of evidence).

[noinfringers2]

He probably was born in Kenya but I believe he was conceived in Indonesia with father being a Guru named Subuh.

[Lurking Libertarian]

Iirc the first two cases that reached the SCOTUS were not dismissed but used the courts variation of tabled so that they may be revisited at the courts discretion. One of them had the state SoS as the defendants which would probably have not been ruled in our favor as there is no place that they are assigned the job to vet. Don’t remember who the other had as defendants. Both should be O and the individual in the democrat party who put him up for nomination.

Speaking as a lawyer admitted to practice before the Supreme Court, I can tell you that there is no procedure under the Court's rules for a case to "be tabled so that [it] may be revisited at he court['s] discretion." Can you show me any citation for your statement?