Compelling Evidence of the Forgery of Obama’s Birth Certificate Lodged with the US Supreme Court...

Birtherreport.com ^ | March 29, 2014

[Hotlanta Mike]

Washington D.C. (MMD Newswire) March 28, 2014 -- Douglas Vogt has lodged with the United States Supreme Court his compelling forensic evidence that the Birth Certificate of Barack Hussein Obama, II is indisputably a forgery.

That forensic evidence is contained in Vogt's 95 page Public and 75 page Sealed Affidavits. Barack Hussein Obama, II - at his White House Press Conference on April 27, 2011 - released his Birth Certificate to prove that he was Constitutionally-eligible to be President. The lodging of the Affidavits accompanied Vogt's filing of a Petition for Certiorari with the Supreme Court which has been assigned Case No: 13-1158. That Petition seeks review of the refusal of the Federal District Court to refer Vogt's Affidavits to a federal Grand Jury as required by Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 6(a).

Rule 6(a) states: "When the public interest so requires, the court must order that one or more grand juries be summoned." Vogt's Petition argues that there can be no higher "public interest" than the issue of whether Barack Hussein Obama, II, has foisted a forged Birth Certificate upon the Citizens of the United States. Accordingly, the Petition argues, the lower federal court has breached its Congressionally-imposed duty to "summon" a Grand Jury to hear Vogt's well-founded, forensic proof of the forgery of Obama's Birth Certificate.

[HotHunt]

I am a graphic artist and can find my way around Adobe Illustrator and Photoshop with some skill. I personally downloaded from the White House website, the PDF file of the long form birth certificate that Obama released. My personal examination of the document revealed to it be an outright fake.

Within hours of its release to the public, hundreds of graphics experts from around the country came to the same conclusion. That this document is a creation of many parts put together to look real but with obvious flaws. If this BC released was a photocopy of a real BC in Hawaii, you would not be able to split all of the layers up and examine them. It would be just one layer. And I am not sure why the person or persons who created this forgery, did not do what every amateur graphics person knows to do and that is to flatten the image so the layers could not be examined individually.

The document is a created, manipulated composite of many different layers, saved as a PDF file. It contains multiple layers that make up the final document. None of the layers were “flattened” or merged or compressed into one single layer. It is a Photoshopped image. A true forgery.

If you or I presented this document as a “true and correct copy” of the original, we would be sitting in a prison right now for forgery. Forgery is a felony. And yet the president of the United States did just that and no ones says a peep. There is no doubt in my mind, that we have had a huge fraud perpetrated upon us.

[Nero Germanicus]

No one has filed an official forgery criminal complaint with a law enforcement agency since April 27, 2011 when the whitehouse.gov image first appeared.

And of course, the only birth certificate for Barack Obama that really matters is the original, vault edition, hard copy which resides in the office safe of the Hawaii Registrar of Vital Statistics, Dr. Alvin T. Onaka.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/04/27/obama-birth-certificate-moved-secure-location-months-ago/

If anyone would like to examine the original version, Hawaii law permits that under the provisions of Hawaii Revised Statutes 338-18(b)[point 9].
What is needed for inspection of that vital birth record is an order from a court of competent jurisdiction.
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrs2006/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0018.HTM

[Marine_Uncle]

Well bitt. Let us see how the SCOTUS staff respond to this one.
If they just brush it away as a bad sign, whatever, then we shall know how this will go.
Nowhere comes to mind. Within the past six or so years, have I sensed the poison level within this Republic within high circles continues to amaze me as how delinquent within the framework of our Constitution, they turn their backs.

[Jet Jaguar]

Bump

[hoosiermama]

So did any of those who examined it file charges.? Surely there is more than one individual in this country who is willing to stand up and file the criminal charges this act merits !

[Liz]

We knew Obama was a fraud when he surfaced in 08....said he wanted to be another Reagan (waiting for hysterical laughter to die down) portrayed as a Global Savior. canonized w/ the Nobel Peace Prize.

Everything he does is a fraud......he duped Americans into the massive fraud known as Obamacare....the damage being done is palpable.

INCONVENIENT FACTOID---Ohaha was spawned from the viper pit of Chicago criminal politics---our WH is infested w/ Chicago criminals---these lowlifes never never met a decent, honest person in their entire lives.

INCONVENIENT FACTOID---O's 2008 PR person---Anita "Mao Kiss-up" Dunn---later said they let the media (voters) know only what THEY wanted them to know about Ohaha.

INCONVENIENT FACTOID---2012 candidate O told the Russian PM on an open min that he'd have more flexibility AFTER his 2012 election---knowing he would win using voter fraud--even as the campaign had not even begun.

INCONVENIENT FACTOID--- O's political henchman David "I'm Harmless" Axelrod took CBS-TV on a weird tour of 2012 campaign hdq. But nothing was happening. The shady voter fraud work was being conducted in swing states.

THE CHICAGO WAY

[rodguy911]

I have seen that inheritance aspect/argument before and it makes really good sense. If I had lots of money and lots of time,I don't have either, I would jump in and see what I could find. Absent that I depend on you,Fred,Jeremiah and others for the straight stuff.You guys do exemplary work.Wish I was more help.

[rodguy911]

I’m quite sure Roberts wants the story of how he smuggled his kids into the country which is fairly easy to document, even the NYT “almost” did it,buried deep into oblivion.He’s still gotta be vulnerable,IMHO.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[Hotlanta Mike]

And you know who Anita Dunn’s husband is Bob Bauer, former White House counsel for Obama and now representing Obama as his personal attorney. Guess what Bauer’s specialized focus is in law?

“In Bob’s 30 years of practice, he has provided counseling and representation on matters involving regulation of political activity before the courts and administrative agencies of national party committees, candidates, political committees, individuals, federal officeholders, corporations and trade associations, and tax-exempt groups.”

http://www.perkinscoie.com/rbauer/

Repeat...REGULATION of political activity.

Remember this name because it ties in with the IRS tagreting of conservative groups.

[devolve]

- Obama is setting up his royal Muzzie buddies mid-east Islamic oil countries future cash-flow to get an massive endless off-shore retirement fund for himself and his daughters by permanently blocking the use of America’s available and abundant energy assets…..

- It is time for the pathetic pansy Mom-Jeans jerk to put on his sissy helmet to visit Dallas on his girl’s bike -

[advertising guy]

I, me, an Army on one......and freeper told the world the IRS was cheatin Tea Party folk......you mighta heard bout it

[HotHunt]

I’m retired and on a fixed income. I also just had heart surgery not long ago. I have no interest in squandering the rest of my life or income or health on fighting with the federal courts and the government, going broke in the process, trying to prove this. I’ve already proved it to myself and satisfied my own curiosity. We have people in the Congress who should be doing this.

But you go right ahead. You seem to be willing to suggest someone else volunteer for the job. Why don’t you take it on?

[sheik yerbouty]

“It’s not fascism when we do it!” Jarrett is this regime’s Rasputin. Subpoena and indict her, and the others will fall..

[DiogenesLamp]

You only prove that a rotten tree bears rotten fruit.

[Nero Germanicus]

I agree with you. Rotten appeals with rotten briefs written by rotten lawyers deserve to be tossed on the compost heap of history.
There are many brilliant conservative constitutional attorneys in this nation. I’m talking about folks of the stature and reputation of former Solicitor General Ted Olson or the attorneys for the Federalist Society and the American Center For Law and Justice. Not one of them has gone anywhere near a birther lawsuit or appeal.

[DiogenesLamp]

I agree with you. Rotten appeals with rotten briefs written by rotten lawyers deserve to be tossed on the compost heap of history.

No, you don't agree with me. The administration of law should be foremost about principle, not process. Refusing to address an important principle because of procedural issues is exactly what is wrong with the legal system. Would Brown v Board of education have been any less valid of a principle of law had it been badly filed or argued?

Not one of them has gone anywhere near a birther lawsuit or appeal.

Which proves what? From what I can see, the entire legal system has been TAUGHT the wrong understanding of Wong and the 14th amendment for over a century. They have been systematically TAUGHT incorrect law, and because of this WRONG KNOWLEDGE, they are not inclined to address the issue.

[Nero Germanicus]

There is no Court in the land that would attempt to undo the results of a national election and abrogate the electoral will of 70 million and then 66 million voters. The Constitution does not give Judges that power. The more conservative the judge, the less likely they will be to intervene.

U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter: “There may very well be a legitimate role for the judiciary to interpret whether the natural born citizen requirement has been satisfied in the case of a presidential candidate who has not already won the election and taken office. However, on the day that President Obama took the presidential oath and was sworn in, he became President of the United States. Any removal of him from the presidency must be accomplished through the Constitution’s mechanisms for the removal of a President, either through impeachment or the succession process set forth in the Twenty-Fifth Amendment. Plaintiffs attempt to subvert this grant of power to Congress by convincing the Court that it should disregard the constitutional procedures in place for the removal of a sitting president. The process for removal of a sitting president—removal for any reason—is within the province of Congress, not the courts.”—Barnett, et. al. V Obama, et. al., U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, October 29, 2009

[DiogenesLamp]

There is no Court in the land that would attempt to undo the results of a national election and abrogate the electoral will of 70 million and then 66 million voters.

Whether or not an election gets "overturned" is irrelevant to the point. All the courts need do is make a determination and stop concerning themselves with the outcome.

That business of deciding law based on how they THINK things will turn out is the very opposite of the rule of law. It is law by subjective whim, not by objective meaning. The court has taken a "Let the chips fall where they may" attitude so many times in the past, (Brown v Board of Education, e.g.) that I do not find it credible that they would refrain from doing so if they wished otherwise. It is merely just another excuse for the courts not doing what they don't want to do anyway.

Furthermore, I don't want to hear about "Process" when the PROCESS is that only a "natural born citizen" is eligible for the Presidency, with the enforcement provision being the axiomatic duty of every American involved in the civil process.

[Nero Germanicus]

Any number of courts have made definitive and final rulings on this issue years ago.
For example, there were fifty eligibility challenges to Barack Obama heard in courts or by state elections commissions in 22 states in the 2012 election cycle.
For example, after a “trial on the merits” Administrative Law Judge Michael Mahili, State of Georgia Administrative Hearings ruled in Farrar et. al., Welden, Swensson and Powell v Obama: “For the purposes of this analysis, the Court considered that Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in Ankeny, he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen. Accordingly, President Barack Obama is eligible as a candidate for the presidential primary under O.C.G.A. under Section 21-2-5(b). February 3, 2012
http://www.scribd.com/doc/80424508/Swensson-Powell-Farrar-Welden-vs-Obama-Judge-Michael-Malihi-s-Final-Order-Georgia-Ballot-Access-Challenge-2-3-12