Posted on 03/27/2014 4:01:29 PM PDT by lbryce
The actual title of the article is Disgusting: Clinton Snared In Pedophile Ring which I felt could be read as misleading, and that perhaps the author went too far. Instead I used the term found in the video.
If the Moderator believes the original title applies I would be more than happy to have it revert back to the way it was published..
According to former child sex slave Virginia Roberts and a class action lawsuit against convicted billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, former President Bill Clinton was present during sex parties involving up to twenty underage girls at Epstein’s secluded island in the Caribbean. That flight records show Clinton was flown on numerous occasions to the island on Epstein’s private jet. Clinton had a close relationship with an employee of Epstein’s who compiled thousands of photos of nude young girls posed in lewd positions. And these photos were used as a catalog for Epstein to loan out his girls to powerful politicians and British royalty, including Bill Clinton.
According to the lawsuit:
…Clinton was friends with an unnamed woman who “kept images of naked underage children on her computer, helped to recruit underage children for Epstein… and photographed underage females in sexually explicit poses.”
While Epstein was indicted and jailed for his pedophilia, Bill Clinton oddly has remained unscathed, more than likely by having friends in high places.
If Bill Clinton is in fact a pedophile, will the American people demand that he be put away for a very long time so that he can’t hurt any more children? Or will having friends in high places exempt him from the rule of law?
Time will tell.
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournalism.com ...
Nothing in connection to Bill Clinton is respectable.
Just look at her face, brimming with hormonal desire. She’d offer her the Vice Presidency if only she was eligible.
Just look at her face, brimming with hormonal desire. She’d offer her the Vice Presidency if only she was eligible.
I’ve seen stories about this for the past couple of days. I guess it’s kind of like Obama’s past. It’s horrible, disgusting, immoral and illegal, but more than likely, nothing will come of it. However, I find it plausible from that man. Maybe this is what convinced Hillary to step aside in favor of Obama.
bump
Bookmark for later. Disgusting.
I doubt that Mr. Bill is a paedophile. Paedophile actually has a biological meaning. Mr. Bill surely likes legally underage girls but not likely prepubescent girls. I suppose he is a “legal” pedophile, though. There is an important difference. A paedophile who likes very young but developed girls is not a pervert. One who acts in the manner described toward girls of any age, however, is evil and perverted. If true, and it probably is, Mr. Bill should get squashed.
It is not really hypocrisy. Leftists believe and say that any thing at all that anyone else does is wrong and evil and offensive and forbidden and anything espoused by an approved leftist is right and good and mandatory.
I believe that the author answered his own question.
The "American People" as represented by the main stream media, will never demand anything of Bill Clinton, other than the "privilege" of performing fellatio on him. The only time Bill Clinton and Hillary too for that matter, will receive justice is when he stands before Almighty God.
As far as I am concerned, hell cannot be hot enough for Bill. I just wish he was already there.
And not nearly as evil.
Jeepers ... thanks for the ping!
Has this been confirmed?
What do you think... possible?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.