Posted on 03/23/2014 8:38:57 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
To date, a reported 50,016 people have guaranteed the eventual confiscation of their firearms by obeying the “Assault Weapons” registration requirements of Connecticut’s new gun law.
But according to a 2011 study commissioned by the Connecticut Office of Legislative Research it is estimated that more than 300,000 additional weapons have NOT been registered, their owners refusing to relinquish either their semi-auto rifles OR their liberty to Connecticut lawgivers. (Given recent record sales years that 300,000 could today be 400,000 or more.)
So in spite of the threats of Connecticut’s left-wing politicos to imprison those with the courage to defy unconstitutional legislation, the overwhelming majority of gun owners in the Constitution State have effectively told their elected officials to shove it.
And it’s this wholesale repudiation of unjust legislation that spells disaster for lawmakers in Connecticut as it will...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
P.S. Nuclear MAD, Mutually Assured Destruction, is also retaliation. Consider our going to their houses as a form of MAD. Don’t come to our house if you don’t want us going to yours. It is as simple as that.
Don’t come to our house if you don’t want us going to yours. It is as simple as that.
BINGO!
OK, you go ahead on the women and kids. I’ll take the thugs, but since I don’t intend to be MADded, it’ll be from ambush when they’re away from home. Preemptive self-defense, as it were.
Is the < /sarc > tag necessary?
You just keep being that eGOP pacifist. It works so well.
With respect to your post #10, from whence I copied this, I'll bet that he feels that way, too. Some scum get their jollies out of a feeling of power.
Re your post 41, right on, CodeToad! That’s the way we have to approach tyranny. If one lacks the stomach to do so, then just don’t participate.
conn. just had its commie ‘turn your arms in’ moment. we know what happened after that.
Not Gestapo they were plain clothes secret police. These goons are Waffen SS .
They are the ones who would liquidate entire villages . They were only able to do this because the general population was disarmed.
Pacifism, wrong, did you miss the part of disposing enemy leadership? That’s the point of 4th generation warfare. Enablers, planners and their aides.
While collateral damage may happen, innocents are to be avoided to maintain moral high ground and not turn off general populace support. Though this scumbag administration had no problem sending guns untraced to Mexico slaughtering innocents, wouldn’t be far off for same tyrants with Eric “my people” Holder at helm to do false flag killing innocents done “by pro-2nd amendment terrorists” to influence public against resisters.
The news hacks bowing and supporting such propaganda ensure their editors will be targets as well. That includes any intellectual movers and shakers who’s “studies” conclude anti-2nd amendment sentiment. Their families? Nope.
“did you miss the part of disposing enemy leadership?”
Good luck with that. They’ll be behind miles of defenses giving orders far from your reach. Kill their families. Make the families put pressure on them to stop.
More ridiculous assumption on your part. Everybody’s reachable son.
EVERYBODY, ha ha.
It’s fully available for anyone who wants it to get Zero the Usurping fraud on the phone for a friendly chat for example. How to do that and methods offered come with the unintended consequences of open source info and fancy media exposes.
No response to how killing innocents would affect public opinion and cause of resistance eh?
Without a doubt, those things will happen in certain instances as is nature of dirty war, vendettas, feuds locally, but concerning the goals of 4th generation warfare it’s not a long term feasible strategy.
Got it, gramps. You’ll take your walker right up to them and kick them in the knee.
Hey, don’t blow my cover!
You just lost all credibility with that post.
Targeting Cities that have thousands, if not millions of ‘innocent’ family members is different than targeting the ‘innocent’ family members individually .. how?
As ex-infantry in Nam, I can say with some authority that (Cong) family members were every bit as enthusiastic for killing us as their husbands/sons/brothers were.
Mama Sans were known for arming their children to explode on contact with American GI’s.
Left hand side of the vehicle in front of the tire, you will see that the steering box is exposed. It’s body is made out of cast steel and at best is 3/16 of an inch thick. It is kind of brittle. A .30 caliber steel jacketed bullet should be able to punch a hole in it. This will either cause it to jam, or all the P/S fluid will drain out making it a bitch to steer due to the caster settings used on power steering equipped trucks and because of the width of the tires.
Because targeting a single person, the work of a sniper, shows a particular malice for that person — the attack on a city is not, per se, directed at an individual. (Oh, several foreign merchants were in the city when we laid siege to it? Oh well, sucks to be them.)
As ex-infantry in Nam, I can say with some authority that (Cong) family members were every bit as enthusiastic for killing us as their husbands/sons/brothers were.
My only infantry stint overseas was doing detainee ops in Iraq; I can't say what the general disposition of the populous was because I was busy being a prison-guard.
Mama Sans were known for arming their children to explode on contact with American GI’s.
And an armed kid is still a combatant (read as "legitimate target") and an illegal combatant according to the Laws of War (which means that he wouldn't get the legal protections that even a uniformed [lawful] combatant; i.e. it would be perfectly legal to blow him away when he surrendered).
Aim point is the nose, because it severs the spinal cord where it joins the brain, resulting in instant death.
Just a few drops in the right place will disable a vehicle and damage the injectors. In fact, a little air in the right place (fuel return line, fuel filter, etc.) does the same thing minus the damage.
Talking about mechanical injection in the latter part.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.