As noted in the keywords,
the grandfather paradox has always relegated the possibility of time travel to the genre of science fiction. The premise of the grandfather paradox seemed to have settled the question of time travel with the sceanrio in which someone goes back in time and kills his grandfather, which ultimately renders him non-existent and if so then he wouldn't be around to kill his grandfather which would then have his grandfather survive, securing the time traveler's existence as descendant, and so going back in time to kill his grandfather.....
And that speaks for any attempts at time travel as means to changing history. So, you might as well conjure up some other scenario for the failure of Obama-Don't-Care.
1 posted on
01/29/2014 11:10:03 AM PST by
lbryce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: lbryce
I'd be more impressed with this conclusion if the scientists in question could tell me with some degree of certainty just what a photon is.
2 posted on
01/29/2014 11:12:38 AM PST by
Oberon
(John 12:5-6)
To: lbryce
This merely proves (if correct) that a packet with zero rest mass cannot travel faster than light. That’s has been known from the math behind special relativity for a long time.
3 posted on
01/29/2014 11:12:50 AM PST by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: lbryce
This can’t be true. I saw the movie Peggy Sue God Married—not to mention Back to the Future. Time travel all over the place. It happened in one of Ray Bradbury’s short stories too. How many examples do I have to give?
To: lbryce
Dammit. I wanted to go back and get some cars.
5 posted on
01/29/2014 11:15:43 AM PST by
Jeff Chandler
(Obamacare: You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.)
To: lbryce
Agent J: There's no such thing as time travel.
Agent O: Well, there is.
Agent J: No. There's not. Because if there were, a class-one senior agent such as myself would have been made aware of it, wouldn't he have?
Agent O: Were it not classified and way above his pay grade.
Agent J: You know what? I need a pay raise.
7 posted on
01/29/2014 11:18:52 AM PST by
DannyTN
(A>)
To: lbryce
I read about this in June 2045.
10 posted on
01/29/2014 11:25:12 AM PST by
JRios1968
(I'm guttery and trashy, with a hint of lemon. - Laz)
To: lbryce
Yes, of course, but this will not put an end to the wild-eyed believers who are absolutely convinced that “time travel” is possible.
Time is the measurement of motion. (St Thomas of Aquinas. Right then, right now, right always.)
As such, there is no way to travel in it.
11 posted on
01/29/2014 11:26:54 AM PST by
I want the USA back
(Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
To: lbryce
Tell me that story again, Grandpa!
12 posted on
01/29/2014 11:27:27 AM PST by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: lbryce
Did someone forget to tell this guy?
13 posted on
01/29/2014 11:28:27 AM PST by
Lx
(Do you like it? Do you like it, Scott? I call it, "Mr. & Mrs. Tenorman Chili.")
To: lbryce
So that means we’re STUCK here??!!!!
15 posted on
01/29/2014 11:29:55 AM PST by
Argus
To: lbryce
Maybe they should test a faster proton. The one they picked might have been an out of shape overweight smoker.
To: lbryce
Yep. That’s what we thought in 2025, too.
To: lbryce
“The possibility of time travel was raised 10 years ago when scientists discovered superluminal or faster-than-light propagation of optical pulses”
And at the time I said that “time travel” was impossible.
19 posted on
01/29/2014 11:33:27 AM PST by
I want the USA back
(Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
To: lbryce
IOW, light cannot travel faster than the speed of light.
To: lbryce
If time is simply the movement of system from a state of higher energy to a state of higher entropy, can someone explain how a particle’s ability to exceed the speed of light can equate to a reversal of entropy?
22 posted on
01/29/2014 11:38:52 AM PST by
IronJack
To: lbryce
Hmmmmm...and all these years I thought ludicrous speed was faster than light..my bad.
23 posted on
01/29/2014 11:39:35 AM PST by
ratzoe
(damn, I miss Barbara Olson)
To: lbryce
I would like to travel to 2015, buy a copy of the Wall Street Journal, and then come back to today.
To: lbryce
"If you're traveling in your car at the speed of light, and you turn on your headlights...do they do anything?"
--Steven Wright
25 posted on
01/29/2014 11:46:13 AM PST by
Milton Miteybad
(I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
To: lbryce
A few years ago an imaginative young man conjured up an intriguing emphatically unscientific approach to testing whether time travel was possible or not. This is a true story.
He rented a suite at some hotel, summoned a gathering of friends, acquaintances under the title of "2005 First Annual Time-Travel Symposium", hoping that a true time traveler would find the novelty of appearing at the very first Time Travel Convention much too alluring to pass up.
And while the concept appeared really interesting as some sort of temporal flypaper in getting time-travelers to appear and reveal the concept as very real, it was just too hokey to actually work. Besides, what aspect of time travel did the symposium offer to actually entice a true time traveler to show up other than mere rhetoric?
Perhaps, a souped-up Delorean or two might have done the trick.
26 posted on
01/29/2014 11:46:19 AM PST by
lbryce
(Obama:The Worst is Yet To Come)
To: lbryce
“There was a sound of thunder.”
Anyone get the above reference?
30 posted on
01/29/2014 11:52:32 AM PST by
Drawsing
(Fools show their annoyance at once, the prudent man overlooks an insult. Proverbs 12:16)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson