You just ignore anything that goes against what you want to believe.
Only diehard Obama supporters would believe what the liberal media reports. Initial reports (before the White House got involved) were no internet connection and no telephone. They would really like on Moveon.org.
Why make up more nonsense to fake a personal attack.
You are wrong in your claims about the early coverage, reporting some primitive hovel “”And don’t forget that the initial stories coming out of the media were his compound was primitive, no TV, no computers, no nothing.””.
These are the actual stories, this was typical of the first news reports.
“”By MIKE ALLEN | 5/2/11 7:51 PM EDT
The assault force of Navy SEALs snatched a trove of computer drives and disks during their weekend raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound, yielding what a U.S. official called “the mother lode of intelligence.”
The special operations forces grabbed personal computers, thumb drives and electronic equipment during the lightning raid that killed bin Laden, officials told POLITICO.””
The huge news was the death and the capture of all the computer drives, the part about the internet and landlines was about SECURITY ISSUES, Bin Laden was using couriers to avoid the NSA and American electronic capabilities.
You are making up this nonsense about the coverage creating computers and tv weeks after the raid, and you are totally misinterpreting the meaning of why the MILLION DOLLAR COMPOUND was described as not having internet or phone lines.
When has that ever changed? When did you find the phone lines and internet to his compound?
Here is what is written in the book, "No Easy Day".
No Easy Day: The Firsthand Account of the Mission that Killed Osama bin Laden is a military memoir by "Mark Owen", the pseudonym of a former member of the United States Naval Special Warfare Development.
That is still the case, do you think that he did have an internet connection and telephone line?