I repeat. If you’ve got no problem with a federal agency allowing a potential suspect to dismantle the critical evidence in a crime scene, then discussion with you is pointless.
Do you have a problem with it, or not?
“Do you have a problem with it, or not?”
Well, I’m not in favor of the NTSB failing to uphold regulations, but I also don’t consider it to be any kind of evidence of a crime. So what is the pointing in focusing on that, when it gets you nowhere closer to the truth about what happened to Fuddy?