.
Check out # 116 , and # 134.
.
Posted on 12/26/2013 10:12:33 AM PST by Fawn
Well, I tried to watch this since I got home from work, but this just isn’t credible at all. She claims to be Obama’s half-sister, and they show a photo purporting to be this woman with Obama, but the photo is of Obama’s real half-sister, who is an entirely different person from the woman being interviewed. To top it off, she claims Obama’s REAL father is her dad, but her father cannot be black, since she is lily white herself. So her white father had a child with Obama’s white mother and produced a half-black child through sheer genetic anomaly? I don’t think so.
Also, to suggest that someone working for the Medellin Cartel in their heyday would be stuck in community college also just seems laughable. Almost as laughable as the idea that the Medellins would hire out document forgery to young Floridean junior college girls. Wouldn’t get my hopes up on any of her testimony being true.
.
Check out # 116 , and # 134.
.
Well, there really is a Stanley Ann Dunham, so she is wrong on that point. Also, on her website and in the video, she uses a picture of Obama’s half-sister Maya Soetero-Ng, and claims it is one of herself. So she is lying on that point.
My guess is she doesn’t have any real photos of herself with Obama, because they never met. She probably noticed she had a bit of a resemblance to his real sister and decidedly to try and pawn herself off using that photo as her only piece of “evidence”.
The sad part is she did not underestimate people’s skepticism, it seems.
“A couple weeks ago, Fuddy was somewhat mysteriously killed in a non-fatal plane crash.”
What’s so mysterious about a middle-aged woman dying in rough ocean? Also, who “killed” her, the ocean? Mother nature? Also, how can a crash with one fatality be deemed “non-fatal”?
“Lt. Quarles Harris Jr. was cooperating with the FBI on Obama’s passport access when he was murdered.”
No, sorry, but that is a myth.
The crash doesn’t appear to be what caused her death, the ocean wasn’t that rough, and she didn’t drown. The others - except her deputy director - all thought she was fine when she was bobbing around with them, and couldn’t believe when they found out she died. Her deputy director thought she needed to be calmed from the very beginning; he held hands with her until she let go and became unresponsive.
After the examination portion of the autopsy was done there was still no cause of death, which means there must not have been any fatal injuries from the landing.
Ah, you two lovebirds appear together again....
wtf
what information would be too personal for the POTUS not to have his own info in the same databases forced on the rest of us by his own organization?
demand answers
I do not know what to believe at this point, but its going to involve DNA testing to confirm what he really is, and that is not going to happen.
I am sure of this, however, that about 90 percent of what he says is not true.
Haven’t seen you in a while Mojo.
So Non Sequitur’s latest incarnation 0.E.O went buh bye about in late August. I wonder what screen name he’s got now? I’m sure he’ll be back. LoL.
http://www.freerepublic.com/~0eo/
“His house taxes, as per Chicago info and his tax returns don’t jive. The taxes paid on that house were more, IIRC than what they put down on their return.”
Is that including the property taxes on the parcel that Tony Rezko paid for? They may have jiggered things so that the majority of the taxes were assessed on one PIN number, which Rezko paid instead of Obama, as a way to hide kickbacks.
Those taxes on the Chicago home they never visit were paid by a lawyer who’s name is on the deed. Obama isn’t listed on the deed unless he’s part of the listed trust. IIRC, the woman professor who’s living in the guest house is on the deed. Bottom line, the house is nothing but a front.
“The crash doesn’t appear to be what caused her death, the ocean wasn’t that rough, and she didn’t drown.”
Well, she survived the crash, but if the plane hadn’t crashed, she wouldn’t have died, so I think it’s safe to say her death was caused, at least indirectly, by the crash. As for the ocean not being “that rough”, the pilot said otherwise:
“Once out of the plane, he said he could not locate any of the cushions he had removed. He spotted a cooler floating in the water, but couldn’t reach it because of the ocean conditions.
“The wind and the wave conditions were so bad, I couldn’t catch it. No way,” he said. “It was horrible.””
“After the examination portion of the autopsy was done there was still no cause of death, which means there must not have been any fatal injuries from the landing.”
Sure, but I still don’t see any big mystery here. We have a middle-aged woman treading water in rough seas for a long time. Death would not be a remote possibility, even just from simple exhaustion, in that scenario. It would happen quicker if she was panicking, as you say the deputy noted.
Okay... I’m not familiar with the screen name, but if you say so.
There are just so many people who are going to steal his personal information and then claim to be Barack Obama...
lol
It’s sort of like trying to sell the Shroud of Turin without anybody suspecting anything, as Inspector Clouseau on “The Pink Panther” might say.
“Both those claims if proven are enough to make people worry about who really is our President.” LOL ... over half of the people voting in America don’t care from whence has arisen this bastard boy so long as the gib-me-dat continues to flow from fedzilla to the chosen. America is no long a We The People Constitutional Republic so caring about the authenticity of the degenerate running the White Hut is a joke.
Treading water in rough seas for a long time? lol
The Coast Guard guy who rescued them said the weather wasn’t bad and the photos somebody who just happened to be flying overhead show the plane sinking in the water fully intact in conditions that are not so terrible. She was not treading water; she was in a yellow inflatable life vest designed to hold the head above water. And depending on which of the many reports you believe, about a half-hour after the crash she had still had time after dying to drift 200 yards from the guy she had been holding hands with. So she died after what, maybe 10 minutes of being in 78-degree water in a life vest?
And what kind of condition would that have caused which wouldn’t be determined as the cause of death after an autopsy examination?
This is from an article that was posted on FR some days ago:
“Maui police Lt. William Juan has said the NTSB is involved in determining a cause of death. However, the NTSB says that’s up to Maui County.
“I am the lead investigator over the accident but I don’t have jurisdiction over the county,” Struhsaker said, adding that the NTSB can provide information that will help determine a cause of death.
The investigation involves interviewing the people who were near Fuddy in the water, Struhsaker said.”
Do you find it odd that a police lt. doesn’t (appear to) know whose responsibility it is to determine the cause of death? You’d think part of his job wd be to know such things. In fact, he probably *does* know. Yet he attempts to foist the bailiwick off onto the NTSB in spite of knowing otherwise. This makes it look like the cause of death, in Fuddy’s case, is a hot potato & he’s just trying to get it out of the hands of the county. Pretty bizarre, isn’t it?
[Original post: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3104197/posts?page=1]
Ah, I suppose dispelling my simple-minded, gullible, self-affirming conspiracy theories is a noble pursuit. Thank you for caring.
First, by describing Fuddy as falling prey to a fatality of a non-fatal accident, I was making an intentional word play to underscore what I consider to be rather peculiar about the circumstances of Ms. Fuddy’s death.
As to why I would bother making a reference to Fuddy’s death, I feel confident that there’s nothing new I can share which will cause you to consider making even a partial concession that I “may have a point there.” To do so would be to publicly contradict the identity you have been fulfilling for yourself in these discussions.
I will say, however, that I find your response to my post intriguing, if not telling. I have not yet reached a final conclusion that Fuddy’s death involved anything more than an accident. To me, though it falls within the realm of “somewhat mysterious.” Those are the words I used in my post, not “shocking mystery, or breathtaking conspiracy,” etc. To which you responded “What’s so mysterious . . .”. Gee whiz, Mister. Sorry. Would it be okay if I described the matter as “a teensy bit eyebrow-raising”? Or would you swoop in to take exception with those words as well? In the same respect, isn’t the phrase “was killed” regularly used without any reference to conscious human agency as the cause? Yet you respond as though I used the words with the force of “was murdered.” “Who killed her, . . .Mother Nature?,” you incredulously ask.
If someone were to consistently take the tone that reasonable people (not just kooks like me) might associate with an over zealous, junior-ranger badge-seeking conspiracy debunker, might he begin to loose a bit of credibility? Just pondering out loud a bit there.
For folks who missed it, here’s a local television news interview with the Coast Guard rescue swimmers/first responders who reached Loretta Fuddy:
http://m.kitv.com/news/a-us-coast-guard-rescue-swimmer-describes-the-crash-scene-as-surreal/-/17421002/23462950/-/9juqdjz/-/index.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.