Levin’s plan is constitutional. Nullification is not.
What you say is a fact, and is not why I posted this.
I am trying to explore the arguments against an Article V convention so as to strengthen my argument for it.
eg: http://www.eagleforum.org/publications/column/article-v-future.html
The fictional runaway Philly Con-Con is conveniently located on the first excerpt linked above.
Levin is a fraud. That so called expert on the Constitution was cheeleading the patriot act, department of fatherland security and every other foundation of today’s police state. I think I’ll take advice on the Constitution from someone who wasn’t wrong all along.