Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: dontreadthis

Levin’s plan is constitutional. Nullification is not.


4 posted on 12/12/2013 5:41:10 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

What you say is a fact, and is not why I posted this.
I am trying to explore the arguments against an Article V convention so as to strengthen my argument for it.

eg: http://www.eagleforum.org/publications/column/article-v-future.html


7 posted on 12/12/2013 5:51:32 AM PST by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg
The point remains: You can "fix" a government that tramples the Constitution by attempting to write new amendments that they will ignore, or worse, torpedo and sabotage in a possible "runaway Con-Con," similar to the one I described in my novel "Foreign Enemies And Traitors."

The fictional runaway Philly Con-Con is conveniently located on the first excerpt linked above.


18 posted on 12/12/2013 6:10:44 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

Levin is a fraud. That so called expert on the Constitution was cheeleading the patriot act, department of fatherland security and every other foundation of today’s police state. I think I’ll take advice on the Constitution from someone who wasn’t wrong all along.


45 posted on 12/12/2013 8:28:54 AM PST by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson