Posted on 12/08/2013 2:20:22 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper
Hes beyond learning. He has another agenda and, firstly, I dont think Obama is his own man, Mr. Williams said in a TV interview at the weekend.
He is a puppet of George Soros, he added, referring to the liberal billionaire businessman and philanthropist.
Mr. Williams believes Mr. Obamas presidency ultimately will be regarded along the lines of Jimmy Carters as a somewhat failed administration.
He said it is unfortunate that Americas 1st black President is incompetent.
(Excerpt) Read more at livetradingnews.com ...
Well certainly we know that the evil forces are behind the teleprompter. Soros and Muslim brotherhood and their islamoNazi pals. But Obama believes in their satanic anti-American causes too. So puppet yes but
The public image of Valerie Jarrett, in addition to Disciple of Soros, the two personae quite compatible.
Re your post #6, I think almost all Freepers know what position Mr. Walter Williams holds.
I don’t know bout that Her learned a lot about governing from Mandela. He has driven the debt up our money is worthless and whites are under attack.
What were the odds 1:10000?
Obama is His Own Woman, Incontinent, And Beyond Worming
You get the drift, don’t you?
I suppose you realize you could have included the first paragraph of the article which identifies “Williams” and still not come close to the 300 word limit on excerpted articles.
much worse than baggage handler. at least baggage handlers have a job and work for a living. I have seen no evidence Obama ever had much of a job before becoming Senator where his job was running for President
If America wanted a real black man, they should have elected Herman Cain.
They didn’t, though, or they wouldn’t have elected this incompetent, America-hating fraud.
That is helpful. However, I was able to immediately eliminate Juan Williams as an option.
President Jarrett will not be pleased.
If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court. I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order as long as I could pay for it Id be o.k. But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasnt that radical. It didnt break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states cant do to you. Says what the Federal government cant do to you, but doesnt say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf, and that hasnt shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was, um, because the civil rights movement became so court focused I think there was a tendancy to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.
Instead they got mostly an Arab. 0 is 1/8 black.
LOL!
good simile
Yes, me too. Many people got sold and locked into “the first black president” thing by the MSM.
The MSM has been using the race card non-stop ever since.
Some Conservatives (the smart ones like you, more interested in spending time on important observations rather than fatigue an ally with superfluous ankle biting, I might add) have already warned about sexism becoming the new racism, if Hillary (God Forbid) becomes president.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.