Posted on 11/16/2013 6:06:33 AM PST by iontheball
Several alternative news sites are now reporting that there are multiple copies of Barack Hussein Obama’s “real” birth certificate that have surfaced during the Alabama Supreme Court eligibility case. The multiple birth certificates appear to be a huge indicator of fraud.
The Alabama Democrat Party has submitted an amicus brief in the McInnish Goode v Chapman Appeal case. In that brief, the Alabama Democrat Party submitted a completely different birth certificate than the one that was posted at the White House website in 2011.
Larry Klayman, the plaintiff’s counsel submitted the now famous and proven forgery of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate that was posted to www.whitehouse.gov on 4-27-2001. The Fogbow/Jack Ryan Obama BC supporter group produced yet another bogus one. And now, a third birth certificate has been submitted by Alabama Democrats to the Supreme Court.
Although the Alabama Supreme Court is being presided over by Chief Justice Roy Moore, another justice on the court, Tom Parker, will also hear the case. Parker has commented in a previous case: “McInnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the “short form” and the “long form” birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”
(Excerpt) Read more at ppsimmons.blogspot.com ...
“It is my belief that if this court proves he is a non-citezen it is worthless unless someone takes this ball and runs with it, someone with power and respect.”
I would suggest The Donald.
Full auto Baby!!!!
Yeah, I agree with you.
The only downside to that is that Biden would probably pardon Obama for all his crimes like Ford did Nixon and he would never have to pay for the damage he’s done and we taxpayers would be supporting his lifestyle for the rest of his life.
If he finishes his term, he can still be criminally prosecuted after he leaves office.
Could be. It was someone from her side that started this little snowball down the hill.
What exactly are the differences btween the three documents? What is different b/w the Fogbow BC and the Alabama Dem BC?
Why bother?
This is Larry Klayman we're talking about. This won't go anywhere.
Post much?
The data on each copy is the same so they really aren’t different Certificates of Live Birth.
What is being discussed is differences in Moire’ Patterns that are produced by different photocopiers when you copy a document that is printed on safety paper. The moire’ patterns are there specifically to show that what is being seen is a copy and not the original document. It is a protective factor against identity theft and counterfeiting.
If you look at Mitt Romney’s scanned birth certificate, you’ll see the word “void” which is another protective factor. It does not mean that the data is void, only that the image being viewed is a copy. On different copies of the Obama birth certificate, the background pattern varies because different photocopiers were used.
It is likely that the very distinctive moire’ pattern on the Alabama Supreme Court’s copies was caused by copying a copy.
If anyone wants to know a bit about safety paper and moire’ patterns.
“Kan’t Kopy Paper:” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kan’t_Kopy_paper
I’m sorry, I didn’t catch that.
What did you say?
That reply was to a case a few years ago that was dismissed by the Alabama Supreme Court. It is NOT related to the case now before the court, the one the court has refused to dismiss, and includes the affidavit from Zullo.
Ping to #13!
Thanks faucetman!
snip:
“ The entire Obot minutia portfolio has been completely eviscerated. Their smokescreen has been obliterated. To all of those who have had deep concerns about the matter of the authenticity of the birth certificate – you have been vindicated. You were right! This will eventually come to light. Be patient.”
13 posted on Saturday, November 16, 2013 7:39:22 AM by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma’am, Just the facts)
Article, #99 , #123, # 155 , but... #156.
There are new freepers on *this* thread, so information is slowly being disseminated.
ALL our elected officials are complicit in this criminal cover-up. They’d rather destroy the Constitution, and the entire Country, than to be called racist.
Thanks, WildHighlander57.
But it does mean exactly that, that the data is suspect because it is a copy, and so is to be considered as void for legal purposes.
It may be that the document was simply copied directly from a copier in Romney's case, and did not have values falsified in the crude copying process, but that's not the point.
Anything other than the originally issued certified document cannot be relied upon. Your moire patterns indicate that the document is a copy, but says nothing to the credibility of the content of the document other than that is is no longer valid as being the document that was issued by the certifying agency.
-PJ
You’re welcome!
(Now what in the world happened with faucetmans keyboard.... maybe it leaked, LOL)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.