Skip to comments.
Her child has to have DOCTORS NOTE to send a packed lunch to school.
Momdot.com ^
| 10/
| staff
Posted on 10/26/2013 9:28:49 PM PDT by Nachum
What the wha???
I cannot tell you how hyped up I am at this note my friend Linda received today from her childs school.
Her child has to have DOCTORS NOTE to send a packed lunch to school.
And does anyone notice the irony in the health coordinator and enforcement of no bagged lunches?
(pic used w/ permission from linda)
(Excerpt) Read more at momdot.com ...
TOPICS: Food; Government; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: child; doctors; government; lunch; michelleobama; note; obama; schoollunches
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Bananas
1
posted on
10/26/2013 9:28:49 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: All
ok, seriously. if the collapse comes, there are going to be so many people on the arrest list, its not even funny.
2
posted on
10/26/2013 9:31:26 PM PDT
by
willywill
To: Nachum
Well, that’s because we must follow Madame Obama’s mandate for eating properly. Otherwise you must starve!
3
posted on
10/26/2013 9:34:06 PM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: Nachum
My son-in-law has a doctorate in physics. Would that do?
4
posted on
10/26/2013 9:34:53 PM PDT
by
Slyfox
(Satan's goal is to rub out the image of God he sees in the face of every human.)
To: Slyfox
Of course. It only says “Doctor”!
5
posted on
10/26/2013 9:36:13 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
To: Nachum
6
posted on
10/26/2013 9:37:59 PM PDT
by
Rides_A_Red_Horse
(Why do you need a fire extinguisher when you can call the fire department?)
To: Rides_A_Red_Horse
Doctor Who? Dear Teacher,
In the year 2020 when the US school lunch program collapsed only those children who had their own food did not starve to death. Therefore little Michael must be allowed to bring lunch from home.
[signed] The Doctor
7
posted on
10/26/2013 9:43:02 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Everyone get online for Obamacare on 10/1. Overload the system and crash it hard!)
To: Nachum
Obviously, the government knows better than the parents about what’s best for their children. (/sarc)
8
posted on
10/26/2013 9:43:34 PM PDT
by
Innovative
("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
To: Nachum
Oh, you should post the second photos. That’s the one that got my husband!
Ice cream being sold to the students during PE??
9
posted on
10/26/2013 9:43:38 PM PDT
by
Marie
(When are they going to take back Obama's peace prize?)
To: Nachum
10
posted on
10/26/2013 9:44:06 PM PDT
by
Kirkwood
(Zombie Hunter)
To: Nachum
I would send a letter back to Ms Queen of the World and remind her that she is MY employee, and the child is MY child and I will send a lunch with MY child if I want to. That it is none of her business if MY child has a sack lunch.
11
posted on
10/26/2013 9:50:37 PM PDT
by
GeronL
To: Slyfox
My son-in-law has a doctorate in physics. Would that do? Just out of curiosity do you think he would side with the mom or the school?
I know the technical studies side of universities have more conservatives than do the liberal arts but there is a whole lot of brain washing going on at most campuses.
12
posted on
10/26/2013 9:54:57 PM PDT
by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
To: Nachum
There is no law forbidding lunch from home. Likely this is some 25 year old revolutionary follower of Obama. That or someone doing what someone else told them was required. This has no more legal weight than that teacher who was telling kids they could be arrested for disrespecting Obama.
Demand they produce it. It’s simply bureaucratic BS saying that the school only gets federal money for the number of lunches they sell.
A letter from an attorney like Sekulow should shut this garbage down nicely.
13
posted on
10/26/2013 9:55:02 PM PDT
by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
To: Nachum
14
posted on
10/26/2013 9:58:54 PM PDT
by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
To: Nachum
Heh. My son stepped off the school bus when he was in Kindergarten and puked all over the sidewalk.
He’s almost 17 now and hasn’t had a school lunch since then. Homemade sandwiches or soup in a thermos, fruit and homemade brownies or cookies are always in his lunchbox. His friends envy his lunches.
15
posted on
10/26/2013 10:00:25 PM PDT
by
mplsconservative
(Barack Hussein 0bama has American blood on HIS hands!)
To: GeronL; Nachum
That it is none of her business if MY child has a sack lunch. I would say that it is time to for all parents and concerned citizens to go to their local school board meetings en-mass and demand that their school district opt out of the Federal School lunch programs and really all Federal programs.
16
posted on
10/26/2013 10:01:53 PM PDT
by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
To: Nachum
And a doctor cannot send a note detailing that a child must follow a special diet. HIPPA baby!
No school could demand a note spelling out the details of a child’s medical condition. HIPPA, ADA, etc ad nauseum. This ALONE proves that the school is making this policy up on the wing. And a school cannot use medical as the only exemption. Halal? Kosher?
What a joke.
Send them an attorneys letter saying that refusing to let them eat it will be child abuse, and that confiscation of the child’s lunch from home will be seen as larceny.
17
posted on
10/26/2013 10:02:02 PM PDT
by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
To: DesertRhino
some cities have basically banned sack lunches, like Chicago
18
posted on
10/26/2013 10:05:37 PM PDT
by
GeronL
To: Nachum
the note should simply state that for the child to receive ANY nutrition during the day at school at all, a packed lunch is required since the child cannot be forced to eat the CRAP served at the school...
19
posted on
10/26/2013 10:07:34 PM PDT
by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: GeronL
Just because they haven’t been sued.
20
posted on
10/26/2013 10:15:44 PM PDT
by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson