Skip to comments.
Alot vs. A lot: 9 Language Crimes to Watch Out For
Dictionary.com ^
 | 24 October 2013
 | Dictionary.com
Posted on 10/24/2013 10:50:34 AM PDT by COBOL2Java
Irregardless
 Irregardless is considered nonstandard because of the two negative elements, ir- and -less. Irregardless first appeared in the early 20th century and was perhaps popularized by its use in a comic radio program from the 1930s. Use regardless to keep your grammar-loving friends at bay. 
 Thusly
 Because both thus and thusly are adverbs, language aficionados find thusly unnecessary. The Chicago Manual of Style discourages the use of thusly altogether. For copyeditors, spotting the word thusly has a cringe-inducing effect similar to hearing fingernails on a chalkboard. 
 Everyday
 Be careful when using everyday. As one word it's adjectival; spelled out as two words, every day is adverbial. If you remember to do your everyday chores every day, your grammar-savvy roommates will appreciate you. 
 Anyways
 While it's commonly used in speech and writing, anyways is nonstandard. Always drop the "s" and opt for the standard anyway to impress the language fanatics in your social networks. In a world of 140-letter tweets, that one saved character is valuable real estate. 
 Literally
 The Internet is literally full of critics of the figurative use of literally. While employing this metaphorical usage might make many casual language lovers' ears bleed, descriptivist lexicographers will hail you as a language innovator. Our advice: be self-aware. Know that if you use literally figuratively, it will sound horrible to some, and perfectly acceptable to others. 
 Alot
 Alot is a frequent misspelling of a lot. As many middle school English teachers constantly remind their students, "A lot is a lot of words." So make your old English teacher proud. 
 Alright
 As an informal variant of all right, alright is perfectly acceptable. The popular song and album "The Kids Are Alright" by The Who is evidence of general acceptance of alright. However, note that the creators of the 2010 film The Kids are All Right couldn't bring themselves to use the informal variant even if the title was a clear nod to The Who. 
 Fewer
 Confusion of the terms fewer and less will set off alarms in the heads of language enthusiasts. Fewer is only to be used when discussing countable things, while less is generally used for singular mass nouns. For example, you can have less salt, money, honesty, or love, but fewer ingredients, dollars, people, or puppies. 
 Hopefully
 Self-described language buffs might explode with untamed rage if they hear hopefully used as a sentence modifier as in "Hopefully, it won't rain tomorrow." However, since the 1930s, this sense has been folded into acceptable usage. That said, it's important to understand the extreme reaction you might provoke if you use this common sentence starter. If someone gives you guff, just refer them to Dictionary.com's excellent usage note at hopefully. Crisis averted.
TOPICS: Books/Literature; Reference
KEYWORDS: 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next  last
    
To: COBOL2Java
    Alright, hopefully people will learn something from this, but anyways....
 
2
posted on 
10/24/2013 10:51:55 AM PDT
by 
GeronL
 
To: COBOL2Java
    “I informed you thusly. I so informed you thusly.” Dr. Sheldon Cooper
 
3
posted on 
10/24/2013 10:52:04 AM PDT
by 
goodwithagun
(My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
 
To: COBOL2Java
4
posted on 
10/24/2013 10:54:09 AM PDT
by 
null and void
(I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
 
To: COBOL2Java
    Similar to “anyways” is “towards.” There’s no need for the “s,” AFAIK.
 
5
posted on 
10/24/2013 10:55:40 AM PDT
by 
St_Thomas_Aquinas
( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
 
To: COBOL2Java
    One man’s crime is another’s colorful use of language.
 
6
posted on 
10/24/2013 10:58:58 AM PDT
by 
DannyTN
 
To: COBOL2Java
    While it’s a spelling issue rather than grammar, my pet peeve is seeing the past tense of “lead” spelled “lead” instead of correctly as “led”.
 
7
posted on 
10/24/2013 10:59:15 AM PDT
by 
workerbee
(The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1)
 
To: COBOL2Java
To: COBOL2Java
    Also, the overuse of “impacted” has replaced good old “affected.”
 
9
posted on 
10/24/2013 11:03:31 AM PDT
by 
Salvey
 
To: COBOL2Java
    ‘Folks’ (pronounced FOKES)
-used to refer to everyone from American families of 4 to Al Qaeda terrorists.
 
10
posted on 
10/24/2013 11:03:51 AM PDT
by 
relictele
("An elective despotism was not the government we fought for..." - James Madison)
 
To: GeronL
    Alright, hopefully people will learn something from this, but anyways....I know I learned alot. /sarc
 
To: COBOL2Java
    My editor’s pet peeve was ‘first annual’ anything. An event can’t be called ‘annual’ until it occurs a second time, one year after the inaugural event.
 
12
posted on 
10/24/2013 11:06:19 AM PDT
by 
Bob
 
To: SeaHawkFan
    ewe all!
 
13
posted on 
10/24/2013 11:07:59 AM PDT
by 
Revolting cat!
(Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
 
To: COBOL2Java; a fool in paradise
    I’m sure a lot of posters here could care less!
 
14
posted on 
10/24/2013 11:08:39 AM PDT
by 
Revolting cat!
(Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
 
To: Living Free in NH
    LOL! I knew this thread would generate a few chuckles. :-) 
 I'm an volunteer editor over at www.fanfiction.net (I have a few stories of my own there as well), and this entry in dictionary.com caught my eye. 
 Thanks for the posts!
15
posted on 
10/24/2013 11:09:55 AM PDT
by 
COBOL2Java
(I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite.  The GOP hates me.  Why should I vote for them?)
 
To: COBOL2Java
    Like it will matter next month, when the great majority of people in America will be trying desperately to find something to eat. 
 Yeah, the FR headlines are a little gloomy this morning.
To: COBOL2Java
    Aaargh! “a” volunteer; I had “an” amateur volunteer....sigh
 
17
posted on 
10/24/2013 11:11:40 AM PDT
by 
COBOL2Java
(I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite.  The GOP hates me.  Why should I vote for them?)
 
To: COBOL2Java
    Even though it is proactive, I doubt this will have the desired affect.
 
18
posted on 
10/24/2013 11:11:46 AM PDT
by 
Revolting cat!
(Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
 
To: SeaHawkFan
    Is it yall or yall? It's youse. :-)
-PJ
 
19
posted on 
10/24/2013 11:12:53 AM PDT
by 
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
 
To: COBOL2Java
    “Hopefully, it won’t rain tomorrow.”
Perfectly grammatical, but why is ‘it’ hopeful? Is ‘it’ ever hopeless?
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson