Posted on 10/10/2013 12:28:57 AM PDT by TexGrill
US officials claim that the government's massive data collection has protected the country from terrorist attacks. After The Guardian's first revelations about the National Security Agency's digital surveillance programs, Senator Dianne Feinstein, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and Representative Mike Rogers, head of the House Intelligence Committee, jumped to the NSA's defense by pointing to two terrorist plots supposedly foiled by the organization's digital surveillance programs. Lawyers and policemen involved in these cases disputed these claims, but this did not keep NSA chief Keith Alexander from taking it up a notch by raising the number of foiled attacks to more than 50, and later to 54.
These numbers are crucial for an informed debate about the digital surveillance programs. If the NSA's digital surveillance indeed prevented 54 terrorist attacks, the public can decide whether these 54 attacks are worth their privacy. This number would suggest that the NSA's programs are actually keeping the United States and Europe safe from terrorism.
It is far from certain, however, that the NSA is getting its numbers right.
(Excerpt) Read more at atimes.com ...
While it may seem like an unseemly process, the Worlds digital DNA will be mapped, and better we do it first.
The NSA isn’t foiling terrorist plots? Of course they are. How many successful terrorists attacks have been launched in the past three years by the Tea Party, by Americans with prior military service, by conservative Christians, by NRA members, or by others at the top of Obama’s list? I’d give the NSA top marks for preventing their top targets from doing anything violent.
NSA is for spying on Americans...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.