Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Choosing a “biker mob” gun
bearingarms.com ^ | 4 October, 2013 | Bob Owens

Posted on 10/05/2013 5:53:28 AM PDT by marktwain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-123 next last
To: beebuster2000

In a situation like this NEVER STOP. Even if you have to rock that car back and forth 3 or 4 feet from forward to reverse. Never let them get to a point where they can use your position against you.


61 posted on 10/05/2013 6:46:31 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: The Black Knight; All

If you notice, the moment the shot was fired, everyone in the mob backed off for a few precious seconds.

Most mobs will run away when shots are fired. Two things worked against those in the vehicle in the situation mentioned.

One, the shooter stopped shooting, showing weakness.

Two, it was likely an unusually motivated and cohesive mob.

I agree, getting away is the best policy. But shooting is likely to make an opening, as you mentioned. If more shots had been fired, there likely would have been more of an opening.


62 posted on 10/05/2013 6:47:59 AM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: saganite

I’m not sure about these sport bikes but it used to be that 4-wheel vehicles would stop more quickly than 2-wheel vehicles.


63 posted on 10/05/2013 6:50:43 AM PDT by MulberryDraw (That which cannot be paid, won't be paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

If you’re both driving 90, you don’t have to worry about shooting. And, unless the helmet is Kevlar, I don’t think the carbon fiber is gonna stop a major sized round.


64 posted on 10/05/2013 6:53:28 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

65 posted on 10/05/2013 6:55:08 AM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade
Don’t know why the concept was abandoned, but it seems undocumented today.

Cook off has always been a major problem with caseless ammo.

66 posted on 10/05/2013 6:55:18 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
I have a Glock 21 and a Glock 30 both of which are quite carryable and both of which chamber 13 rounds of the venerable .45 acp. If I need more than that, I can insert 28 round magazines into either pistol but those are novelties really. That being said, I tend to be more inclined towards revolvers with 5-8 shot capacities these days.

The scandium framed J frame, in particular, is just too easy to carry. Though it's five round capacity might be insufficient for a bike gang, it's perfect for 99.99% of the SD situations one might find oneself in. As fall and winter roll along, I'll probably switch back to the Glock 30 though which would be mostly adequate for a biker gang, especially if you have a spare mag or two on you.

A completely adequate solution would be one of the 5.56 mm AR15 pistols with a 30 round mag or, better yet, a beta C mag loaded up with some of the lightweight V-max or varmint grenade projectiles . It is a pistol, it is concealable, and it's more firepower than you would probably ever need.

Try to shoot the mouthy one first. He's the leader.

67 posted on 10/05/2013 6:55:25 AM PDT by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riley

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Nug5FZgxuk

That Dillon Aero looks fabulously fun. if I ever have $50,000 to $75,000, and can afford 750 dollars a minute for rounds,...


68 posted on 10/05/2013 6:55:44 AM PDT by sockmonkey (Of Course I didn't read the article. After all, this is FreeRepublic..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Imho for what its worth, forget the gun.Just chest thumping and machismo on who has the bigger badder gun.
Bikers carry guns too, what if they carried Uzis?
The discussion then travel to wounded pride and an escalation?
This is like trying to shoot a swarm of hornets with a .22.
Bikes at speed cannot swerve around debris, traction is minimal.
Take out the machine, besides myself I would not want to kill an undercover cop, good or bad, they are people trying to do a job.

Evade, and if stopped then go offensive, because then you have more stationary targets.


69 posted on 10/05/2013 6:57:36 AM PDT by Eye of Unk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

Yep.....and likely qualifies as an AOW, or it’s a ‘pistol’ but I don’t think the drop-down grip qualifies it as a pistol.

If an AOW, that’s a $200 Tax stamp....

Anyway, it’s damned nice, a Remington Super Shorty? ...how many rounds...a pump?


70 posted on 10/05/2013 6:58:47 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I do not think I can hit something that size while driver across the body at that speed, I bet some will brazenly just chime in and say they can of course.


71 posted on 10/05/2013 6:59:12 AM PDT by Eye of Unk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

It also helps if you increase your speed and roll them out the sun roof too


72 posted on 10/05/2013 7:01:28 AM PDT by fuente (Liberty resides in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box--Fredrick Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

I think you’d have better chance hitting a head from a car than a head from a motorcycle. But if you’re low speed, I’d always go for a head shot. That takes practice, I know, but with range time and practice, that’s not an impossible task for a few yards....


73 posted on 10/05/2013 7:03:19 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

My bad....as of now, the AOW is $5 but they are going to raise it to equal what a MG or what a silencer costs (both going up to $500)


74 posted on 10/05/2013 7:05:03 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
“why di they do this? blacks on white person again?”

From the Daily Mail,

“28-year-old Christopher Cruz, of Passaic, N.J., with unlawful imprisonment and reckless driving while authorities continue to search for other cyclists.”

Basically, they surrounded the SUV (attempted kidnap) and the driver refused to cooperate, powered out and hit some on the way out.

If you watch the hundreds of outlaw motorcycle riders pursuing the fleeing family, it is terrifying.

75 posted on 10/05/2013 7:09:55 AM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: fuente

As an old geezer who has been around a bit, I found the following posts to be unfulfilling. In NY, if you started shooting and got away, you would have thousands of dollars of lawyer bills until you died. I have great difficulty seeing how one would shoot a pump shotgun while driving. Now if you had someone riding shotgun..... (in an SUV).

What is needed is some really practical suggestions.


76 posted on 10/05/2013 7:13:14 AM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine (An old sailor sends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Tom Paine

The mix I carried in the service works great for me. A Remington 870 riot shotgun, an AR15 (Carried an M16) and a 1911 .45. That covers pretty much every concievable scenario I’d need a self defense boom stick.


77 posted on 10/05/2013 7:15:23 AM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (I'm not a gynecologist, but I'll take a look.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Tom Paine; All

“What is needed is some really practical suggestions.”

The most practical would be to have the police enforce the law, and not allow gangs to take over the streets and terrrify the population.

It can be done. It just takes the will to do it.

It cannot be done when you make policy to allow outlaws to take over the streets “because somebody might get hurt”.


78 posted on 10/05/2013 7:23:28 AM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps

If your immediate goal is to “take out” a bike, yes. If you goal is to make them back off to a safe distance while you are calling 911 etc, then weaving without intentionally striking them will cause them to back off. If you are the one who makes the first contact and wind up killing a biker, you will be charged with homicide. If you merely begin the weaving tactic, you won’t need to make first contact, but you will cause them to back way off.


79 posted on 10/05/2013 7:25:40 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

I think thats why the 1st biker looked in the window...to evaluate the driver before trying to shake him down....
At Least 5 of the bikers were cops....wow

In Detroit they like to walk down the middle of the street..when a car slows down behind them their buddies run up from the flanks,once the car is stopped they do what they want....these guys are playing the same sort of game...with bikes...wonder how many of those little street urchins that Ive seen are gonna be cops when they grow up?

oh well


80 posted on 10/05/2013 7:28:16 AM PDT by Therapsid (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson