1 posted on
10/04/2013 12:21:48 AM PDT by
servo1969
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: servo1969
hate to break to Levin and to others, but out constitutional country has already been lost...
and what exactly does the great Mark Levin suggest be done?.....
2 posted on
10/04/2013 12:30:08 AM PDT by
cherry
(.)
To: servo1969
3 posted on
10/04/2013 12:30:21 AM PDT by
LyinLibs
(If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
To: servo1969
4 posted on
10/04/2013 12:30:40 AM PDT by
LyinLibs
(If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
To: servo1969
5 posted on
10/04/2013 12:30:54 AM PDT by
LyinLibs
(If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
To: servo1969
I just listened to the same segment a few minutes ago. This is what I just wrote, summarizing how I understood Mark:
Why has Obama refused to negotiate, and instead insisted, with Harry Reid, on shutting down the government? Because he is setting the stage for similar intransigence when the debt ceiling comes up.
The Constitution assigns to the HOUSE ALONE the power to impose a tax or appropriate funds. Obama’s plan is to create another deadlock, and then usurp Congress’s power to tax and spend. He will claim the power to raise the debt ceiling and to tax and spend without Congressional appropriations.
Obama will have, in effect, abolished Congress. Leftist think-tanks and leftist law professors have already been publishing articles in which the 14th Amendment is tortured and twisted in order to rationalize Obama’s planned usurpation of the exclusive powers of the House. One of their tricks is to obfuscate the difference between a Congressional “authorization” and a Congressional “appropriation.” The pretense will be that, if Congress has authorized the existence of some program, the President can, by himself, appropriate and spend funds on the program.
6 posted on
10/04/2013 12:31:26 AM PDT by
Arthur McGowan
(If you're FOR sticking scissors in a female's neck and sucking out her brains, you are PRO-WOMAN!)
To: servo1969
7 posted on
10/04/2013 12:31:30 AM PDT by
LyinLibs
(If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
To: servo1969
8 posted on
10/04/2013 12:33:46 AM PDT by
LyinLibs
(If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
To: servo1969
9 posted on
10/04/2013 12:34:05 AM PDT by
LyinLibs
(If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
To: servo1969
Could not the Speaker of the House obtain an injunction from the USSC?
To: servo1969
He can’t hide from the producers. National strike. One man cannot rule freedom lovers.
11 posted on
10/04/2013 12:40:46 AM PDT by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: servo1969
If he does that and congress doesn’t stop him, what are our options? I’m sure the world salivates at the thought of Obama doing this. I don’t want to surrender my country.
12 posted on
10/04/2013 12:41:54 AM PDT by
Irenic
(The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
To: servo1969
Even **IF** 0bama could increase the debt limit, it doesn’t matter.
That still won’t get those 800,000 laid off federal employees paid again.
They are gone.
To get them paid, the House and Senate have to agree on new funding.
In the meantime, the government is running a surplus at the moment without those 800,000 employees on the payroll.
Well, you don’t need to borrow more money when you are running a surplus, and raising the debt limit only means that you can borrow more.
No need.
So Levin’s plan can’t work even IF 0bama could pull off the raising of the debt limit.
13 posted on
10/04/2013 12:43:21 AM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: servo1969
If Obama does this then he can start writing EO’s to fund whatever he wants, ignore congress completely.
16 posted on
10/04/2013 12:50:16 AM PDT by
RginTN
To: servo1969
19 posted on
10/04/2013 1:07:09 AM PDT by
LyinLibs
(If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
To: servo1969; 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ...
Yes, that’s right, if Obamao arrogates to himself the power to raise the debt limit, then he can presumably issue treasuries unilaterally and spend the resulting funds however the hell he pleases. We will have ourselves a genuine dictator when it comes to spending.
PING!
20 posted on
10/04/2013 1:16:04 AM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Major brain damage at UMES, but no property damage!)
To: servo1969
Not much of a big step as he has already long since been bypassing the Constitution.
To: servo1969
Not much of a big step as he has already long since been bypassing the Constitution.
To: servo1969
24 posted on
10/04/2013 1:19:48 AM PDT by
LyinLibs
(If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
To: servo1969
25 posted on
10/04/2013 1:20:19 AM PDT by
LyinLibs
(If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
To: servo1969
26 posted on
10/04/2013 1:20:47 AM PDT by
LyinLibs
(If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson