Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AZ:AG Horn rules Tucson Gun Ordinances are Preempted by State Law
Gun Watch ^ | 27 September, 2013 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 09/27/2013 5:10:23 AM PDT by marktwain

Attorney General of Arizona, Tom Horne, was asked by Representative Brenda Barton if two ordinances dealing with firearms, were preempted by State Law.

AG Horne quoted ARS: 13-3108(A):

A. Except as provided in subsection G of this section, a political subdivision of this state shall not enact any ordinance, rule or tax relating to the transportation, possession, carrying, sale, transfer, purchase, acquisition, gift, devise, storage, licensing, registration, discharge or use of firearms or ammunition or any firearm or ammunition components or related accessories in this state.
 AG Horne replied that the two Tucson ordinances, 11080, which deals with officiers obtaining a blood alcohol  test if he has probable cause to believe that someone has negligently discharged a firearm within city limits, and 11081, which requires reporting of the loss or theft of a firearm, are preempted by the state statute.

Tucson passed the ordinances on May 29th, 2013.

Here is a link to the pdf of AG Horne's reply:

 Link to AG Horne pdf

The practical effect is that the two ordinances are unenforceable.

Preemption statutes have been a major success story for second amendment supporters.  Without them, people exercising second amendment rights face a jigsaw puzzle of town, city and county, ordinances that are virtually unknowable to a person traveling even short distances. 

 ©2013 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.

Link to Gun Watch


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: az; banglist; guncontrol; secondamendment; tucson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: Mastador1

Hey, I think it would be better if you California conservatives moved to AZ and we can send the liberals there and then watch it drop off into the ocean when the BIG ONE hits.


21 posted on 09/27/2013 7:30:46 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

Hey, I think it would be better if you California conservatives moved to AZ and we can send the liberals there and then watch it drop off into the ocean when the BIG ONE hits.

I’d love to when I can, but I’ve got an 82 year old mother that needs my help, and since I can’t rely on my Sister and her family to do it, it leaves me and my Wife. Also it will be a hard sell to get the wife to leave her only grandchild, tough for me also.


22 posted on 09/27/2013 8:00:00 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson