I give up.
that was an impressive (and amusing - from this point of view) show of patience on your part
I agree with you that the article was badly worded (that portion anyway). And you have much more patience than I do with everyone who defends the article by giving alternate explanations of exactly the part you claim is badly worded!
None of that has anything to do with my point, which was, if you are trying to debunk something, you would explain it in the article.
Except, that's not what you said. If you have forgotten, here it is:
The pressure is on the INSIDE, pushing OUT. It’s not a far stretch to think that the pressure would HELP you open the door, not hinder you
You quite obviously did not (at that time) know how the doors work. Jeezus, just admit you were wrong. At a minimum, quick barking and go away.