None of that has anything to do with my point, which was, if you are trying to debunk something, you would explain it in the article.
Except, that's not what you said. If you have forgotten, here it is:
The pressure is on the INSIDE, pushing OUT. It’s not a far stretch to think that the pressure would HELP you open the door, not hinder you
You quite obviously did not (at that time) know how the doors work. Jeezus, just admit you were wrong. At a minimum, quick barking and go away.
so it IS a “far stretch” for a person to assume pressure pushes things out? oooooooo-kay
I said that “it’s not that far of a stretch” .
I should have said that “it’s not that far of a stretch for the average Joe, who doesn’t know the details, and that’s why it seems believeable”.
Other than that, where was I wrong?