1 posted on
09/11/2013 12:02:36 AM PDT by
TexGrill
To: TexGrill
Political Maneuver. What the hell else could any action in that situation be??? What would bombing Assad be if not a “political maneuver?” or sequestering the chemicals?
2 posted on
09/11/2013 12:24:10 AM PDT by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/econohttp://www.fee.org/library/det)
To: TexGrill
Syrian National Coalition=Moslem extremist thugs supported by the CIA, I suspect.
3 posted on
09/11/2013 12:58:09 AM PDT by
867V309
(Stupidity is ordained; Ignorance is a choice.)
To: TexGrill
Sorry, Al Qaeda Muslim Brotherhood, Putin just trumped your Ace of Spades.
4 posted on
09/11/2013 1:14:18 AM PDT by
Fresh Wind
(The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
To: TexGrill
Weird source for that story. Know anything about AFP or the Manila Times because they picked it up from AFP? BTW “Conservative” talk radio listeners there are several “hosts” who are unwilling to give any credence to articles suggesting the rebels were the ones that did the gas attack. of the national syndicated both “Red Eye” hosts,and Hugh Hewitt (favors action) , will summarily dismiss any caller suggesting that idea.
5 posted on
09/11/2013 3:05:25 AM PDT by
mosesdapoet
(Serious contribution pause.Please continue onto meaningless venting no one reads.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
