Replies

We know that the regime has been spying on reporters. How have they responded to that?

If a kid says straight-out to a teacher that they are being abused at home it is very unlikely that they really are. The kids who are being abused are more likely to deny it emphatically - because the threat is real. The lock-step silence of the media suggests to me that they know the thugs have made good on that threat...

Breitbart died less than 5 hours after the one obstacle to his reporting on Obama’s documentation problem was removed - he spoke with Sheriff Arpaio and found that there was ample evidence of fraud, to initiate a criminal investigation. Breitart had been in a very public spat with Joseph Farah over the issue and had said that he wasn’t gonna delve into the story because there isn’t enough evidence and no way to get evidence that would be enough. Breitbart called up Arpaio to ask about the evidence the day before Arpaio was to have his press conference - presumably to find out whether it would be worth covering the event. Breitbart told Arpaio that his evidence was good. Less than 5 hours later Breitbart dropped dead on the sidewalk in a death where the coroner didn’t even check for the most likely covert method of assassination in the autopsy report, which came out 3 days after a technician in the coroner’s office was very visibly poisoned with arsenic while medical personnel ignored his suspicions and the cops lied about the case and refused to even look for what would have been the easy-to-find murderer who did the poisoning. All this overshadowed the Arpaio press conference. No major media outlet reported the actual evidence Arpaio’s posse presented at that presser.

And the same day as Breitbart died and Arpaio held his presser, Rush Limbaugh - the other big, independent (enough) voice who could have carried the story - received a package that referred to 2 famous assassinations, which his team regarded as a bomb threat.

Doug Hagman has a signed statement by one of the on-air personalities who was told in a meeting with the head of his media company that if he or any of his guests mentioned Obama’s documentation problem he would lose his job and the lives of him and his loved ones were questionable. Glenn Beck reportedly left Fox because Fox refused to provide security for his secretary who was receiving threats daily (that was when Beck was hammering Obama’s communist and Islamist roots after first mocking the “birthers” in response to callers who tried to press the issue and force him to address it on air). I had inside information about why Hagman went quiet on the story, which I passed on to Mike Zullo of the Cold Case Posse. He confirmed to me that Hagman’s source that we were worried about had fled the country in fear for her life and the life of her child. And he said they knew of others also.

Michael Hastings was investigating John Brennan when he died in suspicious circumstances - in what Wesley Clarke(?) said looked like it could have been a cyber attack on his Mercedes, which Hastings had earlier that night told a neighbor that he suspected was rigged. John Brennan was the head of the company that oversaw the 3 breaches to Obama’s passport file, which sources close to the investigation said was to sanitize the record.

When somebody gets close to the players on this issue, bad stuff happens.

My husband’s van had the sheathing on the wiring next to the engine cut (or decay uniformly all at once) the day after I was put in contact with Lt Col Terry Lakin’s defense team, to use my evidence of law-breaking by the HDOH in order to overcome the presumption of regularity.

When the Kansas AG was dealing with a ballot challenge in 2012 (a challenge that was eventually withdrawn because the objector feared for his family after the threats he received) the KS Democratic Party chair made public comments calling the questions crazy and I noted on my blog that she had received a letter from Larry Klayman pointing out that the HDOH had effectively confirmed that the HI BC is legally non-valid. Somebody didn’t like my comment and submitted on my blog a comment to me saying that I would be put in jail over this, followed by another comment saying that he/she had helped to create the forgery but resistance is futile because the FBI knows they did it and will protect them. Shortly after that my daughter’s radiator hose had a puncture that appeared to be from the outside; there was nothing for it to abrade against and the quality and integrity of the hose was good. When a very capable hacker helped to try to find out who this poster was, the hacker found gates to hide the location of the poster and when he got close to finding out the real location he hit a tripwire that had been set up; his computer was fried so badly that he couldn’t get it working the last I knew. He gave up on pursuing because he was convinced that we were dealing with somebody very serious and feared for his life.

The kicker on that: months later, as I was typing up an affidavit about this stuff to give to the Lincoln Police Department to report Bob Bauer’s election fraud and misprision of perjury, I C&P’ed the Wordpress email notification of this poster’s attempted post. There was a link to this person’s on-line identity. When I read through the affidavit a week or two later to proofread it, that link was gone from the C&P and in its place was a notification that the on-line identity of that person had been deleted. This person had gone months without deleting the on-line identity (and he used it in multiple settings, including a very interesting, immediate comment about stupid “birthers” in response to the Bin Laden assassination) yet within a week or so of my C&P-ing his online identity in an affidavit that only I knew I was working on (in Word, one of the programs Snowden says can be breached in real time, IIRC), he deleted that online identity.

There’s a bunch more that could be said. For instance, right now my cursor is floating across the screen. I’m obviously not even touching my cursor right now. This happens frequently, along with other stuff like critical emails being stolen (not delivered to Mike Zullo even though I could send to somebody else and somebody else could send to Zullo. I got a notification supposedly from the internet provider saying that the email address was no longer in service - right before a colleague forwarded the email to that exact same address...)

See, the NSA spying, which Snowden says allows them to view what we’re typing in real time, and the stuff that Sharyl Attkisson reported about her computer turning itself on and off (which I’ve also experienced) is not just all in good fun. They do this stuff because they want to stop and/or intimidate people who are getting too close to a truth they need to stay hidden. I’ve said for a long time that Obama’s documentation problems have been blown off because of the crimes that have been committed by those who know it is serious. And THAT is the story that I believe is critical. This issue has always been about the mafia that controls our entire system, including the media. And as long as that mafia controls the system and media, NO ISSUE - no matter how serious and treasonous, such as Benghazi and the allegations coming from Egypt right now, of Obama paying 8 billion to Morsi to have innocent Egyptians killed so Hamas could take over the areas close to Israel - will go anywhere at all. We are literally living under a coup, and that is why none of the checks and balances, rule of law, law enforcement, courts, media, etc are working the way they are supposed to; Obama is running roughshod over it all because he’s got control over everything using the same methods the mafia always uses to get control.

There is way, way more that I could say but don’t have the time to say right now. Suffice to say that I believe these thug methods ARE being used, because I’ve seen them first-hand, although I can’t prove who did them. And I believe what both Hagman and Zullo have said regarding the media folks: the ones who are open-minded enough to see what’s going on are too scared to speak except in confidence.

The Hastings death was meant to appear suspicious so it would silence anybody thinking about picking up where Hastings left off. Just like the Cormier death (the tech in the coroner’s office who was blatantly poisoned with arsenic 3 days before the Breitbart autopsy was to come out). It’s the same reason that Sharyl Attkisson’s computer did blatant stuff like turn itself on and off and bang around in the night: in order to intimidate her into silence. If they only wanted to spy on her they would have hidden their breach of her computer; revealing the breach was for intimidation purposes, just like a LOT of stuff has been done for intimidation purposes, including some stuff I can’t say here.