As I’ve said, showing that Xerox can do these things now is a far cry from proving that they would have done those things on their own in April of 2011. As others have noted, this “discovery” path seems mighty convenient and timely, especially given that these phenomena have supposedly been occuring for close to 10 years without anybody noticing or feeling any impact.
“As Ive said, showing that Xerox can do these things now is a far cry from proving that they would have done those things on their own in April of 2011.”
What the industry-standard MRC process does during compression appears to me to be well documented for over a decade and the Xerox duplication issues are well-documented prior to 2011 on a whole family of Xerox copiers. I seriously doubt that the Xerox MRC software has changed since April 2011.
NBC has not claimed nor has he demonstrated any knowledge of Xerox equipment software code manipulation and his results could NOT be replicated and would be easily exposed as bogus if he had done anything like that.
I don’t see anyone refuting NBC’s claims that he has gotten the replication results he shows in detail on his blog using the Xerox and workflow he lays out.