Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Winston

I have seen the security paper that they used 2 weeks after Obama’s was supposedly printed, and it does not match what is on the White House image - which Onaka refused to verify was a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file.”

Why won’t you believe the legal disclosure of the official custodian of the original record - the only person authorized and legally required to verify what is and isn’t contained on a legally-valid record?

And talk about wasting time. Tell me one scandal that hasn’t been a “waste of time” in the same way that you say this is a waste of time. People are dead in Fast & Furious and Benghazi, just like people are dead from the eligibility issue, and none of them makes a hootin’ hill of difference to the DC guttersnipes. Because they have all said to hell with the rule of law - starting with letting this usurper in office in the first place. Once you’ve given up the rule of law, it’s just a political free-for-all, which is exactly what we’ve got right now. IOW, on all these other issues and everything else we are now eating the lawlessness sh!t sandwich that folks like you said was a waste of time confronting. Tastes real good, huh? There’s no going back to the rule of law until folks like you admit that you made a big-time mistake and reassert that the rule of law DOES matter. Does it matter, Jeff, or do you echo Hillary’s dimissal of the deaths she is responsible for, with “At this point, what difference does it make?”?

If the rule of law doesn’t matter, then why are we even wasting our time on stuff like the Constitution or feigning outrage over stuff that doesn’t even matter? The rule of law is the foundational principle of civilization. When a society says nothing matters, they have become less human than the animals and all that’s left is survival of the fittest.


64 posted on 08/08/2013 8:30:30 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion
Why won’t you believe the legal disclosure of the official custodian of the original record - the only person authorized and legally required to verify what is and isn’t contained on a legally-valid record?

I believe the disclosure of the official custodian of the original record. I just don't believe your characterization of it.

As far as the rule of law goes, I'm with you on the crap like the IRS scandal and the Department of Justice scandal and the NSA scandal. Believe me, I'm with you. If I were in Congress and could do it, I would probably vote to impeach this son of a bitch.

On the other hand, I have seen birthers clamoring as hard as they can for us to set aside the legitimate Constitution of this country and the legitimate laws of this country and reinterpret our Constitution and laws in ways that the Founding Fathers NEVER intended. And anyone who stands in the way of their savaging our Constitution and the rule of law and the real intentions of our Founders is a "traitor" who some of these idiots would literally execute if they could.

So don't talk to me so much about the rule of law. When birthers start respecting it, then maybe we can have that conversation.

65 posted on 08/08/2013 8:41:10 PM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: butterdezillion; Jeff Winston

“Onaka refused to verify was a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file.””

How do you know he refused?


67 posted on 08/08/2013 8:44:28 PM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: butterdezillion

And as far as the security paper goes, guess what? Government offices don’t always necessarily use the same security paper.

They just don’t.

The HDOH and the State, and two governors of both parties have been very clear - at least to everyone except birthers, for whom the rule is “If there is any POSSIBLE way on earth we can read this to mean they aren’t confirming the birth certificate, then that’s exactly what it means.”

They’ve been about as clear as possible that Obama was born in Hawaii, that his birth certificate is valid, and that it’s the same thing as the image that was posted on the WH web site.


68 posted on 08/08/2013 8:44:55 PM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson