That’s been my question. How do these guys know this? Would indicate a connection. Given that they have been spouting disinfo, diversion, and ridicule for years any connection would make them official liars for Obama, ie conspirators.
I believe at least a couple of them are working with both the HDOH and the White House to disseminate disinformation.
I also wonder if one of them is involved in the IRS targeting of Constitutionalists.
And if the scanner in question is connected to a computer, what’s to say that the computer itself isn’t being run remotely by somebody in the regime, so that it does exactly what the regime operator wants it to do? If hackers can control a car remotely to cause a fatal crash, why couldn’t they get a computer to act like it’s scanning a document and then output the White House PDF? There is a reason these people want the capability to control computers, so it would be silly not to ask what they are doing with that capability. They’ve proven they are dishonest and cunning, so they must think we’re idiots if we would trust them to not use the covert abilities they’ve gathered for themselves.
Likewise, those who boast of having created forgeries to have Orly submit in court are nuts if they think we should trust anything they say at this juncture. They’re self-admitted liars.
As are the “leaders” at the HDOH. Forensic examination of the microfilms and paper documents from multiple months and years, as well as the computer transaction logs and an audit of all the vital records and citizenship records are what is needed, given the deceptions, fabrications, obfuscation, and outright crimes committed by officials at all levels. And Benghazi, IRS-gate, Fast and Furious, Extortion 17, Michael Hastings’ and Andrew Breitbart’s deaths, James Rosen wiretaps, Sharyl Attkisson’s computer hacking, etc are all different verses of the same song. It’s all related. It’s all our government targeting innocent civilians while covering for terrorists and usurpers.
With that kind of WHut insider connection, it wouldn’t be too far-fetched to have Xerox or Adobe programmers “update” their software to behave in the far-fetched manner required within limited circumstances. Someone needs have archived the software extant at the time of the original scan for the ostensibly-generating machine. At this point I wouldn’t trust company repository driver software not to have been similarly corrupted and back-dated. Such machines may automatically update their software via the Internet or via periodic company service packs, obliterating earlier software in those cases.
At least catching them in the fashion suggested by above would be as worthy as any Columbo episode!
HF