Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp

I’m wasting way too much time, looking at PDF’s posted at whitehouse.gov. The tax return that was posted to the whitehouse.gov website in April of 2011 is the only time I can ever find Xerox mentioned. All the other times it’s either Mac OS or a verson of Adobe for the PDF Producer and/or Application.

The long-form and short-form BC’s that are posted on the internet are different from all the other documents in that the PDF was produced on a Mac.

And the 2011-posted tax return that NBC cites is different from all other tax returns posted, in that the “Properties” section mentions the Xerox for both the PDF Producer and the Application, rather than an Adobe version for PDF Producer and/or Application.

That’s looking at all the apparently-scanned documents I can find posted on whitehouse.gov from 2009 to 2013; the one in 2011 is the anomaly. If the White House uses the Xerox WorkCentre, then the scanned documents should all show that for the PDF Producer and Application - unless something was done differently so that the properties show different PDF creators. IOW, if the tax return scan showing Xerox WorkCentre as the PDF producer is the way the properties appear on a normal Xerox WorkCentre scan, then what we know is that the long-form, short-form, and all the other tax returns were done some way besides the normal scan.


168 posted on 08/10/2013 9:33:34 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

Some of Binden’s returns also show that they were scanned on a Xerox 7655.


179 posted on 08/11/2013 6:23:27 AM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson