Posted on 08/02/2013 7:46:23 AM PDT by deandg99
The truth is that this is not about left v. right. It is about wrong v. right. Evidence may come out that “the right” was complicit in this cover up, as I believe they are. I believe that we have lots of corrupt legislators on both sides of the aisle that are covering this up like their life depended on it. Because it probably does.
For Congress to spend all of this time beating a dead horse makes me think that they are knowingly complicit or, at least, inadvertently complicit in this cover up. They continue to ask “softball” questions of people who they know will be unwilling to talk. Chances are that nearly every past testimony is already a case for perjury but how will we ever know if we don’t get to the truth?
(Excerpt) Read more at dcclothesline.com ...
I agree, and I think we should hang them all or at the very least...send them to prison to never be free men again. I could give a fiddlers fart what letter follows their name.
So the CIA was running guns? I thought they wanted Stevens kidnapped or killed? Hopefully someone will stand up and tell the truth
Why not just kidnap Stephens when he was out jogging? Way too complicated.
This assessment passes the”SMELL TEST”(in my opinion).Christopher Stevens is captured by insurgents(a set up as there was NO security),and OBOZO comes riding to his rescue (just in time for the 2012 election).Morsi gets”The Blind Sheikh”(so he’s happy),and OBOZO is seen as a HERO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I believe Stevens had even documented that he no longer could ride his bike and walk about town due to increased tensions.. He was not aware Hillary had arranged for him to be kidnapped, so how could he go jogging unless forced to? That wouldn't work. If you look at Morsi's intense campaign and pledge to the MB in Egypt his plan to get the Blind Sheik released by 0bama, the hostage trade grows legs. Remember, Morsi was to meet with Obama in the WH in September. That meeting was called off on 09/24/12. Why call the meeting off if Morsi had nothing to do with Benghazi? Hillary and Morsi were buddies, and I believe at least Hillary set up Stevens, doing this more for Morsi than for an election bump for 0bama. Think of how the media would portray Stevens being held hostage with cries for 0bama to do whatever he could to save his life. 0bama would trade the Blind Sheik, as he wanted to anyway and get a 'foreign policy election bump' which he desperately needed but in hindsight managed to steal the election anyway, breaking Facebook TOS and CFAA Law, NSA intelligence gathering and election results maniuplation, IRS suppressing the Republican vote, DOJ Holder harassing and suing States for their Voter ID Laws, news media covering for Obama, Obama overturning Federal immigration law to garner more Hispanic votes, pro gay agenda for their votes, 'War on Women' and Sandra Fluke, etc..
Bingo.
The gun running op and the staged hostage taking are BOTH true, but unrelated. It's the latter that's a ball buster for Obama.
Nah.... I’m good with hanging. I’ll even supply the rope to save my fellow taxpayers the financial burden.
No need to thank me, it’s an honor and a pleasure...
In the military, this would be called a “Snatch” operation. They are extremely difficult. You can plan and plan, and all of a sudden, everything changes. In the military, you’re taught to evaluate the risk of an operation. Attacking an American compound to get an ambassador? Too risky. Why does it have to be Stephens? It seems like there could be easier targets. And look at the chain of command and logistics involved if Obama was going to try and have Stephens grabbed. The US government working through foreign terrorists to grab an American ambassador? Way too long and complex. Too much chance of mistakes and whistleblowing.
Well, you’re right. The worst kind of mistakes DID happen. But I believe you’re wrong that this was not the plan. You omitted a major power player in all of this, and his close ties to Hillary; Mohammed Morsi. There’s video from the night of Benghazi of a man shouting “Don’t shoot!.. We were sent by Morsi” Why would Morsi send troops? Why? If you look at the evidence THAT WE KNOW ABOUT surrounding Benghazi, the kidnapping plot fits. There may have been attackers hellbent on attacking, but Morsi had his months long campaign of freeing the Blind Sheik in mind, and I’m sure Hillary was more than eager to set the stage for that to happen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
