“Don’t place any trust in the newspaper announcements; they are fabricated.”
IMO, reasonable people can disagree on the forensic claims regarding the announcements. I am persuaded that they exist in numerous archives around the country. They do NOT prove Barry was born in HI in the slightest. They are corroborated by the INS FOIA documents as to date of claimed birth and address of Stanley Ann and claimed father.
I have seen no credible evidence that the INS FOIA documents are forged and I regard them as highly corroborated and highly “verifiable” meaning that names of numerous people and supporting documents can be further investigated, such as the name of the U of H administrator who reported that BHO Sr. had impregnated Stanley Ann and that adoption out to the Salvation Army had been contemplated.
The microfiche reels containing the newspaper announcements could also be legally discovered and examined, but they are secondary circumstantial evidence from an unknown source.
In contrast, the INS FOIA docs are US gov’t documents corroborated by numerous state archived documents (UH and UW transcripts).
“The microfiche reels containing the newspaper announcements could also be legally discovered and examined”
They have already by freeper Ladyforest back in 2010. Here is her analysis Seize.
http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/extra-extra-announcing-obamas-birth/
Testing of the actual reels should be done, because the stories regarding the images we’ve seen online are documentably false, with documents claimed to be from places they could not have been from.
What happens if the claims in a government record cannot be corroborated by the legally-required paper trail? For instance, Alex Galovich at the Passport Office submitted in Chris Strunk’s FOIA lawsuit an early-80’s DOS “cable” claiming that millions of passport applications had been destroyed, but the retention schedule had never been changed, the IG had given a report recommending changes based on the fact that the retention schedules were not GOING to change, records of the destruction were not made, DOS has been charging people to do searches of these records that were supposedly destroyed, and records supposedly destroyed have been easily found. THat being the case, would you find that “cable” to be credible/genuine? How would we know whether it was or wasn’t? We already know that Obama’s passport file was breached 3 times, and sources close to the investigation say it was to sanitize the record. We also know that Obama’s selective service registration was forged, presumably by somebody in that government office. The evidence strongly suggests that the HDOH created a fabricated BC for Obama. Given all that, how can we have any confidence that any government record hasn’t also been tampered with? Right now the US government is one of the least credible sources of information because of the records tampering we already know about, which the system covered for Obama.