Alvin Onaka was asked to verify that Stanley Ann Dunham was the mother, Barack Hussein Obama was the father, and the birth place was Honolulu on the island of Oahu. Onaka would not verify any of those facts.
So we honestly have no idea what the truth is on ANY of those items. Legally. And nobody can legally know any of those facts. There are no legally-established birth facts, unless Obama’s got a legally valid BC from somewhere besides Hawaii - which must be the case if he has been able to get a passport, driver’s license, etc. Whatever BC he used for those purposes must have claimed something other than Honolulu, HI, because only Hawaii can issue a BC claiming a Honolulu birth, and the one HI has is not legally valid.
Nobody can certify Obama as eligible. To do so in order to get Obama on any and every ballot was ELECTION FRAUD. For Obama to swear that he was eligible was perjury in every instance. We know that Obama took office because of fraud and perjury.
Law enforcement failed to do anything about it because they were afraid the political system would punish them - as it has punished IG’s, military people, etc who have actually done their jobs and kept their oaths to protect and defend the US Constitution. The “scandals” that have become public recently are about the Obama regime - with a complicit Congress, bureaucracy, media, and courts - obfuscating, threatening, spying on, refusing to protect and/or giving murderous assignments to, demoting, etc those who stood in their way. Those of us with our eyes open on the eligibility issue have said for a long time that this stuff was going on and were called crazy for it. We’re still waiting for the apologies due - and the recognition that politically-motivated criminal conspiracies by the government are not necessarily too far-fetched to be true, now that we’ve seen Fast & Fdurious, Benghazi, IRS-gate, NSA-gate, Extortion 17, and attacks on investigative journalists such as Michael Hastings, Sharyl Atkisson, and the Fox guy who was being eavesdropped on.
Anyway, the judiciary is supposed to deal with all cases and controversies arising from the Constitution, and SCOTUS is to apply the Constitution to matters of fact and to law. In this case only a federal court can compel the facts to be found out. It is unconscionable that they have said it is nobody’s business whether the Constitution is being upheld or not - and whether everyone in the entire system has FAILED to keep their oaths of office.
So, after all of the extensive investigations, when it comes to each of the three facts needed to determine Obama's status as a natural born citizen (the identity of Obama's father, the identity of Obama's mother, the location of Obama's birth), the investigators still have "no idea" what any of these facts may be. Obviously, then, the investigators still have "no idea" whether Obama is or is not eligible.
That's okay. In fact, I've said from the beginning of all this that I have "no idea" how we can prove with certainly the eligibility of any of our past presidents if that requires that we prove with certainty the identity of the mother, the identity of the father (which is especially difficult) and the location of birth. We really know nothing more about these facts than what we have read in books that were written by people we never knew. I really don't know how I would go about proving with certainty where I was born or the identity of both of my parents. I have just been accepting on faith the truth of what I've been told and what appears to have been written in some paperwork. All I really know is that I shouldn't let myself be crippled by these uncertainties because the rest of the world is going to keep moving forward with or without me. Life does not brake for uncertainty.
Keep investigating Obama's eligibility. Please don't begin a new investigation into Ted Cruz's eligibility until you've finished with the investigation of Obama's eligibility. First things first.
Thanks.