Since when is any State or DC have the right to set wages to a private company? Oh, forgot. Communists America.
Good! So when the folks are sitting home, jobless, they can look to their wise, elder town council, that they voted into office, and thank them!
If the mayor is smart he’ll veto this.
Let see, collecting unemployment, welfare, food stamps, free medical, Obama phones, etc., and sit home on the one hand. On the other hand go to work every day and get $8.25/hr. They can't afford to work.
Secondly think like a marxist, consider the government/union jobs that will be lost when these people are no longer eligible for "entitlements". Consider the lost Democrat voters when these people have to pay taxes out of their own paychecks.
“Brother Bob” is trying to stir up trouble where, maybe, there isn’t any.
Wal*Mart won’t do anything until Mayor Gray either passes or vetoes the bill.
“We don’t need retailers. Retailers need us.”
Well, he’s not quite understanding certain things. People who reside in the District of Columbia currently drive to nearby Maryland and Virginia suburbs to shop at stores such as Target and Wal-Mart. The sales tax they pay stays in those jurisdictions. Among other benefits, D.C. would have gotten a great deal of sales tax revenue if Wal-Mart was located in the boundaries of the District of Columbia. Instead, if people go out of the District to shop, the District loses sales tax revenue.
Yes, while retailers need “us” or customers, Wal-Mart already benefits by attracting D.C. shoppers to their stores in Maryland or Virginia. The District is the loser, since they lose sales tax, property tax, income tax, and other tax revenue by the stores NOT being located in the District. This councilman is clearly not thinking about any of that.
How long before Target or Macy's decide those store aren't profitable anymore, or remodel them to just under 75K SF?
Gosh, all those vote buying dollars gone... Oops.
TOADY SEZ:
LET THE COUNCIL DO IT BWAHAHAHA