Posted on 06/29/2013 3:20:15 AM PDT by marktwain
Why would a woman wear a thong around her neck, especially if she is carrying? Unless she can’t get into it any other way ...
It still shoots fine after 100+ years. If it could talk it would no doubt have some interesting things to say.
What if it’s a clear plastic thong?
Apparently you can cover your face with a scarf and get a driver’s license, vote, and travel by air, but if there’s a bit of strap or cord covering your firearm you’re becoming an outlaw. So what if you put a bag over your head and walk around holding a rifle, pistol, or shotgun? That would have to be alright. Wouldn’t it?
Weren’t we just told by the Supreme Court that state Constitutions are NULL AND VOID if a single judge in a single state says so? Seems to me that is the case.
Get ready for your God-given liberties to be usurped by evil men, Americans.
A couple of years as a graveyard shift clerk at a convenience store might change his attitude toward the rights of law abiding folks to protect themselves as they see fit. Then again, he may be no more qualified as a convenience store clerk than as a judge. America doesn't need another convenience store with stale coffee and a half stocked cooler.
One word “impeach.” The charge would be stupidity unbecoming of a circuit court Judge.
“State Senator John Horhn, Democrat, of Jackson said “we don’t believe that the constitution provides for open carry.”
Somebody correct me if I’m wrong, I may not have my phrasing exactly right. Do our state and federal constitutions “provide” for anything or is their purpose to prohibit actions, specifically prohibit politicians from infringing on our rights? I can’t think of anything in our constitution that prohibits an individual citizen from doing anything.
I have hopes that Gov Bryant will keep pushing and prevail - too many SCOTUS and other court “rulings” that Constitutions don’t mean what they were intended to mean.
I have reached that age when wearing a thong is just too uncomfortable.
The underlying philosophy of the United States legal system, which creates a government of limited powers, is that everything that is not prohibited, is allowed.
Statists prefer a system where everything that is not allowed or mandated, is prohibited.
One has an ocean of liberty with islands of political control.
The other has an ocean of political control, with a few specified islands of liberty.
This often reflects a statists use of legality as a substitute for moral.
Outrageous!
Gonna be a 'front porch thang'. Rain or shine!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.