Let the Muzzies kill each other off. How is THAT not the perfect strategy?
Thus spaketh Madame President.....
And so do I.
I think we should also abandon Afghanistan. In fact, why is the world our responsibility. Let them fight it out and kill each other off.
Gotta love it! GO SARAH!!!
When bad guys are killing bad guys the best strategy is to get out-of-the-way, let them kill each other and look for opportunities afterword.
Right now we have Iran’s cats-paw versus muslims who slaughter Christians.
If we say we’re looking to support the Jeffersonian freedom-fighters, it should be easy to tell them that our support is contingent upon their defending Christian non-combatants among them. Let not a hair on their heads be touched if you want our support.
But we haven’t done that and it doesn’t seem to have even occurred to us. So the rebels massacre Christians and still we fall all over ourselves trying to arm them and support them.
I have never supported our intervention arming insurgents in Middle Eastern countries. This will always be a problem. Radical islam is not something we should support. it will ALWAYS come back to hurt us
To bad the Obama Regime and the State Department are committed to supporting our country’s enemies. Congress should do something - like NOT fund the State Department.
The Syrian "rebels" are A#1 muslim Christian-killers!!!!
Of course, obama, the clintons, and Samantha Power support muslim Christian-klillers every single time!!!! Look at Bosnia, Kosovo, FYR Macedonia, Egypt, Libya, etc.
The muslim traitor obama should be impeached and convicted, and obama, the clintons, and Samantha Power should be tried for war crimes--right here in the USA, NOT in some phony "human rightser" kangaroo "court"!!!!
We probably ought to arrange to ship them out of there ~ their cousins are, after all, some of our larger taxpayers.
If you leave it up to the Moslems all the Christians will be killed.
Palin was not trying to make light of a terrible situation in Syria. What she was doing was expressing the thoughts of the vast majority of people who are tired of us sending aid to people who hate us or sending our sons and daughters to lands to be killed or maimed.
Put in the context of what has become known as the Palin Doctrine, her remarks were clear, succinct, and unambiguous.
Oh, you dont know what the Palin Doctrine is? She spelled it out in a speech in 2011 to military families at the Colorado Cristian University. In the speech she said:
Theres a lesson here then for the effective use of force, as opposed to sending our troops on missions that are ill-defined. And it can be argued that our involvement elsewhere, say in Libya, is an example of a lack of clarity. See, these are deadly serious questions that we must ask ourselves when we contemplate sending Americans into harms way. Our men and women in uniform deserve a clear understanding of U.S. positions on such a crucial decision. I believe our criteria before we send our young men and womenAmericas finestinto harms way should be spelled out clearly when it comes to the use of our military force. I can tell you what I believe that criteria should be in five points.
First, we should only commit our forces when clear and vital American interests are at stake. Period.
Second, if we have to fight, we fight to win. To do that, we use overwhelming force. We only send our troops into war with the objective to defeat the enemy as quickly as possible. We do not stretch out our military with open-ended and ill-defined missions. Nation building is a nice idea in theory, but it is not the main purpose of our armed forces. We use our military to win wars.
And third, we must have clearly defined goals and objectives before sending troops into harms way. If you cant explain the mission to the American people clearly and concisely, then our sons and daughters should not be sent into battle. Period.
Fourth, American soldiers must never be put under foreign command. We will fight side by side with our allies, but American soldiers must remain under the care and the command of American officers.
Fifth, sending in our armed forces should be the last resort. We dont go looking for dragons to slay. However, we will encourage the forces of freedom around the world who are sincerely fighting for the empowerment of the individual. When it makes sense, when its appropriate, we will provide them with material support to help them win their own freedom.
We are not indifferent to the cause of human rights or the desire for freedom. We are always on the side of both. But we cant fight every war. We cant undo every injustice around the world. But with strength and clarity in those five points, well make for a safer, more prosperous, more peaceful world because as the U.S. leads by example, as we support freedom across the globe, were going to prove that free and healthy countries dont wage war on other free and healthy countries. The stronger we are, the stronger and more peaceful the world will be under our example.
Palin expressed what most Americans feel. The left likes to paint her as a neocon. Her doctrine on foreign interventions says differently.