How the heck does Kathleen Sibelius have the authority to say whether or not anyone gets a transplant?
By refusing to overturn an HHS policy that had been in place for years that said children under 12 should not be considered as recipients for adult lungs. Apparently when the policy was enacted there was no procedure for adapting the larger lungs for a smaller childs body. Now supposedly there is.
Because under obamacare - you know the one that Congress and musklims are exempt from - you only get care if you're deemed useful to the state.
Going forward I'm sure the litmus test for future judges will be whether or not they're willing to put the NWO above justice and common decency.
if it were an abortion that were needed to save her life. no question, she’d have issued a waiver.
Her parents probably went and registered Democrat and took an oath to never question those in power again, hence saving her daughter from Obama’s death panels.
“...How the heck does Kathleen Sibelius have the authority to say whether or not anyone gets a transplant?....”
Because this silver-haired murderous rat beoch is the newly appointed “Joseph Mengele” of the rat communist party that has literally overthrown our republic...that’s why. She’s so special, doncha know?
You think that’s bad wait till Obamacommiecare goes into effect. Judging whether a kid lives or dies will be a daily occurance. My father already got a letter from his doctor that due to Obamacommiecare he can now only get a colonoscopy every 10 years. He’s 73, so in other words he will never get a colonoscopy I assume unless he pays for it out of pocket. In other words health insurance no longer exists. Sort of like the government taking over car insurance and never paying out when you get into an accident.
First, a group of Doctors set the guidelines for transplants that H&S must follow....
Second, After asking the doctor’s panel to review the policy, KS has the H&S attorney’s stand down and not challenge in Federal Court the parent’s request effectively allowing the ruling to go in favor of the child.
Given her legal and authority constraints, she did the right thing and walked a thin line...
Not a fan of hers but in this case she did the right thing....