Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
I can’t give details but can assure everyone that the wrong manual being cited was an error not a lie.

I don't see how you can say that, butterdezillion.

They stated clearly that they HAD the federal 1961 "Vital Statistics Instruction Manual." They called it by its precise name.

And Jerome Corsi said it took them months to find "the 1961 code book," but they found it.

Then they showed the world information from 1969 that was plagiarized from someone else's web site, and information from 1968 that was clearly from a 1968 manual.

Well, did they have the 1961 manual, or didn't they?

And if they didn't have it, then why the hell would they claim they did?

I mean, obviously, they DIDN'T have it. Because if they had, they never would've made the claim in the first place. Or, if by some miraculous chance, the 1960 manual said what they claimed (but they said they had the 1961 one), they would've produced that.

So they didn't have the manual. But they said they did anyway. And they showed the world bogus images.

That's LYING, butterdezillion. And showing people stuff from 1968 and 1969, and claiming it's from 1961, is FRAUD.

In fact, if they had known what the hell they were talking about, and were honest, then they would never have made the "number 9 means, blah, blah" claim in the first place, because the feds did all the federal data entry from microfilmed originals, THEY did the federal coding, and they could not POSSIBLY have written on the paper certificate - since they didn't have it.

So either the Cold Case Posse are liars and frauds, or they are absolute jackasses who lack even the investigative skills and attention to detail that one would expect from Inspector Clouseau.

In either case, why should anybody on earth believe anything they say?

Because they're either liars and frauds, or they are worse than Clouseau.

163 posted on 06/02/2013 12:22:01 AM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Winston

I asked the KS SOS’s office if the letter of verification they received had a raised seal on it. Nothing shows up on the scan. The bureaucrat told me it had a raised seal and that it looked like it might be the same one as on the MDEC verification. If it was you would you take the word of the bureaucrat? I had a friend ask the AZ SOS’s secretary the same question and she said yes. Again, nothing shows up on the scan of the document. She allowed my friend to take photos and it was confirmed. So I know that the seal that shows up so prominently on the MDEC letter of verification didn’t show up at all on a scan of the AZ letter. The KS bureaucrat could be lying to me or they could be telling the truth. If it was you, would you believe the bureaucrat? If they told you there was a seal and that the actual document was in the mail to you so you could see it, would you believe them?

If the bureaucrat told you there was a seal and the document was in the mail to you, would you be a deliberate liar and deceiver if you claimed that the document had a seal and you had the document?

Sometimes things are not as cut and dried as they seem.

Which current claims of Zullo are you claiming are wrong, and what is your evidence that they are wrong?


168 posted on 06/02/2013 6:09:51 AM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson