The coming scourge of ObamaCare still the fault of John Roberts

The decision to keep the bureaucrat who headed up Tea Party targeting in charge of Obamacare speaks to a bald affront by the Obama administration to a US Congress now facing some very tough questions of its own. Sarah Hall Ingram scored not a lateral but an up the chain promotion when she was put in charge of a reform division of the Affordable Care Act. But just what are the political ramifications of the 18 month long period in which the painful targeting of conservatives successfully squelched Tea Party opposition to her big boss’s re-election?

The Tea Party targeting scandal has called into question the role which the IRS and thousands of new agents will play as they become healthcare auditors and decision makers for millions of Americans under Obamacare. And now some analysts are going back to re-examine the amazing Affordable Care Act flip flop of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts.

"Knowing what we know about Roberts and his adoption shenanigans,..."

I keep hearing this about Roberts but no one ever offers any facts about the supposed irregularities concerning the adoption of the Roberts' children. Just what did Mr. & Mrs. Roberts do that was so unethical in the adoption of their children?

Now regarding the ObamaCare decision, he may have been blackmailed or bought off. It's difficult to discern the truth regarding his illogical and unconstitutional decision. But it is logical to assume that Roberts has been compromised in some way. I agree with that assumption.

I'm posting this on everyone of these -you want to follow this back. GMC dealerships closed, Gibson Guitars, IRS audits, favored union over bondholders,

Obama senior adviser Valerie Jarrett “After we win this election, it’s our turn. Payback time. Everyone not with us is against us, and they better be ready, because we don’t forget. The ones who helped us will be rewarded; the ones who opposed us will get what they deserve. There is going to be hell to pay. Congress won’t be a problem for us this time. No election to worry about after this is over, and we have two judges ready to go.”

It all ties in to the government employee unions. THAT'S where the rot is. Because these faceless little Eichmann bureaucrats CAN'T be fired and are going to sabotage our country in order to protect their little fiefdoms, pensions, expense accounts and salaries.

Those are the little cockroaches that need to be ferreted out and imprisoned or fired. Start at IRS, TSA, every flag officer that signed off on the Gay agenda and State. Every single political appointee needs to be fired or put on a list for observation and scrutiny in order to file charges of tax evasion, conspiracy to defraud or any number of legal statutes these punks have violated.

Not inclusive of violating our trust in government and our constitution.

Not only did Justice Roberts seemingly ignore key statements in Gibbons which cast grave doubt on the constitutionality of Obamacare, but there is evidence that "leaders" in Congress ignored major constitutional problems with Obamacare as well.

More specifically, below are two "smoking guns," which, imo, are strong clues that the members of the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives were well aware that the states had never delegated to Congress, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for public healthcare purposes.

First, military issues aside, Judge Andrew Napolitano had read Section 8 of Article I on Obama guard dog Fx News more than a month before then Speaker Pelosi rammed Obamacare, Napolitano concluding that there is no clause in Section 8 which grants Congress the power to address healthcare issues.

Judge Napolitano & the Constitution

Based on Judge Napolitano's uncommon common-sense interpretation of Section 8, Congress was required to first comply with Article V, the Constitution's amendment process, by successfully petitioning the states to ratify an amendment to the Constitution which would have granted Congress the specific power that it needed to establish Obamacare.

But even if members of Congress missed Judge Napolitano's clarification that Congress has no Section 8 power to address public healthcare issues, here is glaring evidence that Congress did know about Section 8 and Article V where public healthcare is concerned.

Former Democratic Congressman Jessie Jackson Jr. had been officially trying for years to get Congress to propose a healthcare amendment to the Constitution to the states. But the response from both his majority Democratic colleagues and the silent sheep RINOs was to ignore Jackson's resolution. (FDR's Congress had also wrongly ignored Article V concerning its establishment of many of FDR's New Deal spending programs.)

H.J.Res. 30 (112th): Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding the right of citizens of the United States to health care of equal high quality.

Senator Jackson evidently introduced his resolution in 2005, corrections welcome.

109th Congress, 2005–2006. Text as of Mar 02, 2005 (Introduced).

And given that the corrupt media described Obama as a constitutional expert before he first got elected, basically all three branches of the federal government have to take responsibility for blatantly ignoring the Constitution that they swore to protect and defend where constitutionally indefensible Obamacare and other issues are concerned.

Who knew? /s

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.