To: grey_whiskers
Question:
Does it serve our purpose to bring Nixon or Watergate into the debate?
The Obamists are nothing but Bolsheviks, and, IMHO, we would be better served by referring to their blatant abuses as Marxist, Leninist, or even better, Stalinesque.
Just my $.02.
"Riamh nár dhruid ó sbairn lann!"
Genuflectimus non ad principem sed ad Principem Pacis!
Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The LORD hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name. (Isaiah 49:1 KJV)
5 posted on
05/19/2013 9:15:06 PM PDT by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle!)
To: ConorMacNessa
To get a bit closer to present times (for the benefit of the young skulls full of mush) I’d prefer to call this regime Castresque, Chavesque or Mugabesque.
7 posted on
05/19/2013 9:21:39 PM PDT by
rfp1234
(Arguing with a marxist is like playing Chess with a Pigeon.)
To: ConorMacNessa
The reason I brought up Nixon is that (other than McCarthy and Jesus and Reagan) he is one of the most hated figures by the left in all of human history.
So pointing out that Obama has word-for-word literally engaged in the same activity as Nixon cuts through ALL of the left's defensive BS on a visceral, emotional level.
Cheers!
8 posted on
05/19/2013 9:37:00 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson