Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers
Question:

Does it serve our purpose to bring Nixon or Watergate into the debate?

The Obamists are nothing but Bolsheviks, and, IMHO, we would be better served by referring to their blatant abuses as Marxist, Leninist, or even better, Stalinesque.

Just my $.02.



"Riamh nár dhruid ó sbairn lann!"

Genuflectimus non ad principem sed ad Principem Pacis!

Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The LORD hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name. (Isaiah 49:1 KJV)

5 posted on 05/19/2013 9:15:06 PM PDT by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ConorMacNessa

To get a bit closer to present times (for the benefit of the young skulls full of mush) I’d prefer to call this regime Castresque, Chavesque or Mugabesque.


7 posted on 05/19/2013 9:21:39 PM PDT by rfp1234 (Arguing with a marxist is like playing Chess with a Pigeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ConorMacNessa
The reason I brought up Nixon is that (other than McCarthy and Jesus and Reagan) he is one of the most hated figures by the left in all of human history.

So pointing out that Obama has word-for-word literally engaged in the same activity as Nixon cuts through ALL of the left's defensive BS on a visceral, emotional level.

Cheers!

8 posted on 05/19/2013 9:37:00 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson