I've mentioned my theory numerous times. Obama was adopted by Soetoro. When the Adoption was annulled, or redone in 1971, the state created a new replacement birth certificate.
Of course this current document is computer generated, so sometime between 1971 and 2011, Obama had Hawaii create him a new one. I'm betting it's a legal fake.
Totally agree that in 1971 the official records were ‘re-baselined’. Everything before that is likely in the legal worm-hole when it comes to actual facts and records.
But the LFBC (Laughably Fake Birth Certificate) posted at WH is a modern creation. It is certainly not a scan of actual document. Even if the document is a ‘legal fake’.
In this regard the COLB from 2008 was a better forgery. At least someone did create an actual document. And they took trophy pictures of their work in March 2008. And those became the Fact Check ‘Born in the USA’ pictures in August.
The problem for them is they used very high resolution images. They also left the EXIF data in the files - at first. And they took a flat-bed scan. The combination of these makes the determination of fraud rather easy, very easy.
The BCs are sideshows. Lets see the passport records. Passports are considered stronger proof of identity and citizenship than BCs anyway. Obama should have at least 4 or so previous passports dating back to 1968. Notice I did not say US passports!
1968 passport records and 1971 court records. That would clear all this up.
I'm not buying it. I'm not saying that states can't create a fresh birth certificate for someone in the case of adoption, but rather that I don't think that's the case with this Frankendocument.
If it's a "legal fake," then why won't HDOH take ownership of it by affirming that what's posted on the WH servers is a true copy/representation of the "record" on file?