Well that makes sense too. But there is also the other angle. Namely, how cd a hospital be added to Obama’s “handwritten” ‘birth records’ w’out the hospital’s consent? The forger wd go down fast & hard if they listed a hospital that responded by denying the claim. So they needed to know in advance & for certain the hospital wd go along. Only by some public display—as of a posted letter—wd the hospital be on record as acknowledging the claim, correct?
Only legal discovery including deposition of witnesses and access to Barry 1961 original vital records can get to the truth. All else is speculation.
Based on behavior, as a fraud examiner I see Kapiolani behaving in a way that shows consciousness that their records the they can legally access do not support a claim that Barry was born there. That doesn’t mean that they can prove that he wasn’t but only that they cannot find sufficient evidence to raise money by making their own claim that Barry was born there. They are not prepared to rely on Barry’s claim that he was.
Perhaps Kapiolani asked Barry to provide them with a certified copy of his LFBC and Barry refused!