“Vietnam is filled with plenty of ‘NBC’ from soldiers partying with hookers.”
A birth record filled out by a parent at the time of birth designates the citizenship of the child. If a Vietnam “hooker” fill out the birth record and claimed American citizenship for the child based on the American soldier father, the baby would be an American. The mother could also claim the baby as Vietnamese and the baby would have dual citizenship.
In order for the baby to be anything but a new piece of flesh, a record has to be made by a parent and filed with government.
That still is a 'NBC' via hooker. Kinda belittles the born in America citizenship when ya can just produce one in your 'own' country.
“A birth record filled out by a parent at the time of birth designates the citizenship of the child. If a Vietnam ‘hooker’ fill out the birth record and claimed American citizenship for the child based on the American soldier father, the baby would be an American. The mother could also claim the baby as Vietnamese and the baby would have dual citizenship.”
In the fall of 2009, right when Orly had a case before Judge Carter having submitted an affidavit with the CPGH Kenyan BC attached threatening to result in discovery that could prove the HI vital records to be inconclusive...
...the 9th Circus inserted dicta into a case, Marguet-Pillado, that suddenly declared a foreign-born child born of the unmarried lover of an American to be a potential “natural born citizen” at birth if a mere “biological connection” to an American could be established (if wasn’t in this case).
This issue wasn’t even before the court but suddenly in dicta the court offhandedly declared that in effect, even if Barry’s mom was unmarried and underaged and delivered him in Kenya and was a UK subject at birth, Barry was NBC because he had a “biological relationship” to a US citizen, his mom.
See my FR thread:
“Obama cites US v Marguet-Pillado. Dicta implies Obama eligible even if born in Kenya (vanity)”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2857598/posts
In support of the opinion in US v Marguet-Pillado, 9th Cir. 2011, Judge Gwin, writing for the majority in his “III Analysis” dicta, states: “No one disputes that Marguet-Pillado’s requested instruction was ‘an accurate statement of the law,’ in that it correctly stated the two circumstances in which an individual born in 1968 is a natural-born United States citizen: (1) that the person was born in the United States or (2) born outside the United States to a biologically-related United States citizen parent who met certain residency requirements.”