Dual Citizens are not Article 2 Section 1 Constitutional natural born citizens. Read these words by the father of the 14th Amendment VERY CAREFULLY.
“Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.” (Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866))
If you owe or share allegiance with a foreign sovereignty, you are NOT a natural born Citizen eligible to be president. How can you be eligible for the U.S. presidency with a Canadian birth certificate?
“If you owe or share allegiance with a foreign sovereignty, you are NOT a natural born Citizen eligible to be president. How can you be eligible for the U.S. presidency with a Canadian birth certificate”
He has an American birth certificate, not a Canadian birth certificate.
My copy of the Constitution reads as Amendment XIV (ratified July9,1868) ‘All persons born or naturalized IN the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are CITIZENS of the United States and the state wherein they reside’. Nothing here about a “Natural Born Citizen” as required for POTUSA in Article II and it is certainly the same terminology as to just plain ‘citizen’ used in Article I for eligibility of Congresspersons. To argue that the Founders who were educated persons in writings did not intend a specific difference between the two categories in the same document of citizen is a specious argument. That Amendment XIV does not use ‘natural born’ tells me it was not intended to be the same or be interchangeable for eligibility for POTUSA.