Posted on 04/30/2013 11:11:22 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
The Dems are very worried about something..
if it’s not a forgery, then 0bama would have no problem having it submitted into evidence. right?
this one simple thing has NEVER happened in the 30+ cases that have been brought before the courts.
why?
because they’ve ALL been dismissed before evidence could be submitted.
just like they’re trying to do now.
oh, and btw... the election was held by the state... it’s up to the state to insure that ALL names on the ballot are eligible to obtain the office being voted on. this would require QUALIFYING PAPERS BE SUBMITTED OFFICIALLY to the division of elections.
so the question is... have the QUALIFYING PAPERS BEEN SUBMITTED. and yes, this includes documentation proving citizenship for all federal offices... and natural born citizenship qualifications for the office of the president.
there is no need to get into speculation. JUST SUBMIT THE REQUIRED PAPERWORK
we’ll see what happens after that.
Why hasn’t a single court ordered Hawaii to make available 0bama’s ORIGINAL BIRTH RECORDS? Wouldn’t that be the simplest ‘once and for all’ on this matter?
“Why hasnt a single court ordered Hawaii to make available 0bamas ORIGINAL BIRTH RECORDS?”
_______________________________________________
Or better yet, the records from the purported hospital of his birth, Kapiolani.
If Obozo is legit, why would he not authorize the release of such records?
To me, the SINGLE BEST piece of evidence that something is up is the fact that Obama’s own publicist described Obama as Kenyan-born in his short biography. Either Obama was born in Kenya, or he claimed to be born in Kenya, and that’s a fact.
There is no discovery in Supreme Court cases. The issue under consideration is did the original trial court err when it dismissed this lawsuit.
Obama is not a defendant in this appeal. The defendant is the Republican Secretary of State of Alabama. The lawsuit concerns whether Alabama law requires the Secretary of State to check presidential candidates’ eligibility or not. The defense attorney is the Republican Attorney General of Alabama who is arguing that Alabama law does not have any such requirement.
Sadly...most of GOP talk radio and media agrees with the Dems on Obama Eligibility
However....a ruling against Obama would be welcome news.
Paying $10 to the Department of health gets you a short form abstract. And we know that wouldn’t be good enough for the eligibility doubters, even though it was enough for passports visas etc for my family 2 years ago.
Why should we be satisfied with an abstract when they posted an obvious forgery?
Show us the original hard copy or the microfilm.
Very good but should the case be remanded back to the trial court the issue of eligibility will go forward and the Arizona
Sheriff’s evidence will be admitted. As discovery ensues this will become the Constitutional crisis that all following this case and other similar cases have anticipated.
The Sheriff’s evidence encompasses not only a fraudulent birth certificate but a participatory fraud by the State Registrar of the Hawaii Department of Health.
(Arpaio forgery evidence in AL case)
Someone should tell him to explain that one, that the prospective author submits his autobiography to the publisher.
It’s amazing. When it suits Obama to be of Kenyan birth, he’s a Kenyan. When it suits him to be an American, he’s an American. I don’t think anyone would buy the publisher’s explanation that they made a “typo” either.
btr
not “tens of thousands”
Its more than $2 MILLION
and that was 2, 3 years ago...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.