Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion

and if you can’t afford to send much, you can damn sure circulate this info to your congresscritters AND everyone on your e-mail list.

Even if some people “say” they think birthers are crazy, I’d hazard a guess that there is plenty of curiosity about the topic.

Think exponentially—send to 3 in your address book and eventually thousands may see it.

(and don’t forget your congresscritters—THEY need to know WE know.)


38 posted on 04/28/2013 7:56:50 PM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Mortrey

Yes. What you said.

What I’ve found is that when you really dig into the FACTS, the trolls have to leave. Not one pro-Obama person who thinks “birthers” are crazy has been willing to even address the HDOH’s falsification of the 1960-64 birth index, for instance. I’ve proven that they did it. Norman and Nathan Asing are listed on there even though the BC’s with those names are non-valid because the guys have been adopted and are now Norman and Nathan Roloos. I’ve shown their traffic court records showing those names. I’ve gotten a certified driver’s abstract for Norman Roloos by giving the birthdate of Aug 4, 1961 (the date that Norman Asing’s son was born, according to newspaper announcements). It is a proven fact that the 1960-64 birth index was altered to include selected names from non-valid records.

Nobody will refute this because they can’t. So they ignore it and hope that nobody notices that the HDOH has ALREADY been caught in a criminal act - vital records falsification with the intent to deceive, which, IIRC, is basically the equivalent of perjury by an official in a government agency.

They want us to argue about other stuff so the factual, documented stuff never gets out to the public or to people who could do something about it. We need to get the facts to people. On my blog I put the documentation where anybody can see it, so there is no question about whether this is fact. People need to see that stuff.

On a single line of Virginia Sunahara’s death certificate there are FOUR blatant signs of forgery: a BC# that could not have been on the record in 1961, mismatched and misaligned fonts on the “T.H. FILE NO”, Territory of Hawaii abbreviation (T.H.) on a STATE of Hawaii death certificate, and the federal government’s code for a Hawaii BIRTH on a death certificate. There is not one piece of information on that entire line that is actually what would have been on a 1961 Hawaii death certificate. And putting in all those blatant signs of forgery took extra work for the person at the HDOh who was forced to forge this. IOW, they worked extra-hard to make sure that people could KNOW this was a forgery.

That’s stuff people can see with their own eyes. They need to not only see it but process what it means. Those are critical FACTS, and the people harping on how stupid the “birthers” are will not refute those facts because they can’t. So they ignore them.

We can’t let this stuff be ignored. The facts need to be known.


47 posted on 04/28/2013 8:15:49 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson