Posted on 04/25/2013 11:21:53 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
In a unusual rare move, the Alabama Democratic Party has submitted a amicus brief in the McInnish Goode v Chapman Appeal case. The reason being is most likely because the Alabama Supreme Court has Chief Justice Roy Moore presiding over it. He supported Lt. Col. Terry Lakin during his court martial. Another worry for them is another justice named Tom Parker. He once opined in a prior McInnish case:
"McInnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the “short form” and the “long form” birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public."
This has reasons for the Alabama Democratic Party to be alarmed. In the amicus brief, the Alabama Democratic Party attacked the merits of the appeal, calling the evidence submitted by McInnish “inadmissible and not worthy of belief” and stated:
"A county sheriff from Arizona is not an “official source” of anything in Alabama."
One thing that stands out in the amicus brief filed, specifically on page 33 is something new. It's a Barack Obama long form birth certificate that has a different backing, something not seen before. It's not the normal security paper backing that the Hawaii Dept. Of Health has been using. It is raising a lot of questions that even has Obama supporters baffled. Click on the link and scroll to page 33 of the brief to see the birth certificate.
If there was a single other Selective Service reg card like Obama’s, Soros’ obot army wd have dug it up by now. There is not one. Obama’s forgers are piddle poor at what they do, but their enablers let them get away w anything & everything.
Time was when people wd have minded a POTUS who had to forge his Selective Service registration. It’s not the country it used to be; that country is long gone & it’s not coming back.
Earlier when the case first came up I reviewed it throughly and everything presented as some sort of 'evidence of forgery' looked normal ~
Watch our President catch and eat flies ~ he's very good ~ preternaturally good ~ uncommonly good. There's a reason for that, and it's the very same reason you should accept the fact that as unlikely as something happening around him might seem to be it will happen and he'll be there.
Before the surgery and pigmentation treatments he had another name ~ Joe Btfsplk
It's the luck of the draw what piece is used to mess up your mail or your form.
I saw that. Really professional, huh?
Almost as professional as inserting documents without even attempting to explain their provenance.
And it wasn’t just in case Jane Roe got pregnant again. It was to deal with the situation WHENEVER it came up - which is why Jane Roe’s ability to get pregnant again didn’t matter and was not cited in Roe v Wade at all.
Just like Obama’s ability to run for POTUS again doesn’t matter, if the issue is what responsibility the SOS has when a legal challenge to a candidate’s eligibility is filed. If she was able to totally blow it off for Obama she has the legal precedent to do it for ANYBODY. Even somebody who has a legal birth certificate showing him born in Osama Bin Laden’s hut in Afghanistan.
How can anybody say this doesn’t matter?
I just noticed something else. Exhibit B is Fuddy’s letter to Obama, noting that there were “Enclosures”, followed immediately by the forged BC. That is presenting the forged BC image as if it was the enclosure that Fuddy included - even though Onaka verified that the White House’s forged image is NOT a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file” AND that even the “information contained in” it is NOT identical to the information contained in the original record.
This attorney is perjuring himself ALL OVER THE PLACE in this amicus brief. Deliberately attempting to deceive a court.
Not necessarily Judge Roy Moore...
Here they are -
The ones from the same Post Office are in the right column, second from the top for Bruce Henderson and left column very bottom for Darrel Oniwa.
Look at the one under Bruce Henderson’s - the one for Jules Ventura - stamped at the KAPAA, HI Post Office, the 1980 date is way over to the right on the stamp.
Now look at the one above Bruce Henderson’s - the one for Barack Obama. The first “O” and the second “L” in HONOLULU are missing.
Now look at the Document Locator Number (DLN) for Obama, Henderson and Oniwa.
Date - JUL 31 1980 DLN - 0897 080 653 (Darrel Oniwa)
Date - JUL 29 1980 DLN - 0897 080 632 (Barack Obama)
Date - AUG 2 1980 DLN - 0897 080 613 (Bruce Henderson)
Those DLNs are put on the card when it is processed by the Selective Service Administration.
The SSR card for Obama was originally released to Jeffery Stephen Coffman as part of a FOIA request in October, 2008 and posted by Debbie Schlussel’s website in November, 2008.
Do we go after Nancy Pelosi for signing off on it?
Remember, in all cases neither a round date nor a cancellation are SWORN CERTIFIED documentation of anything ~
Could it be... they want to keep someone out of jail? A lot of someones?
Well, there you have it! I guess I have a suspicious mind.
I was just wondering. :-)
Hillary decided it was better to give up the nomination rather than to tear the party apart and lose anyway.
-PJ
The image you link is just the green background. The pdf has more than just a green basketweave pattern. It has graphics (lines) and text.
Take for example box 6c on the birth certificate. It says “6c Name of Hospital or Institution (if not in hospital or institution, give address)” but when you turnoff the text layer, the green background says “6c N f H al I (if h tal add “. Why would a forger put some of the letters on the background and some on the text layer?
I don’t think the missing “19” is significant of anything.
It may be indicative of the tendency of fringe area post offices to hang onto all their equipment no matter how funky it gets. At least that’s been my several decades worth of experience dealing with those folks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
