Something tells me this is not the final word on this subject. There will be another shoe to drop.
Whatever the case may be, this government owes the people of this country a detailed, truthful and immediate explanation of exactly what is going on here, because right now it looks like they are covering for Saudi terrorists.
Beck goes on for days maybe weeks about some really important expose and comes up with nothing.
I would further like to know why the First Lady visited him and why she was allowed to visit him by the Secret Service.
I am not sure that this story is over yet.
The two bombers certainly had a lot of money to throw around, considering that their mom was shoplifting, their dad had skipped the country, and the older brother had an ex-wife and child to support. When you add in that both brothers were “college students,” their cars and clothes kind of indicate that they had a lot of money, which had to come from somewhere.
I will give Glenn a while longer to make his case.
Make sure before you believe a Washington Paper.
Anytime Janet the Gut speaks about something I know the opposite is true. Citing DHS for accurate information about ANYTHING is asking for laughter all around. Sorry the Examiner guy is pumping false information but maybe it makes him feel better
So, this author’s evidence that Beck, Breitbart and others are wrong is that “DHS says it was another Saudi national that they refuse to name?”
The second Saudi is a fictitious creation of DHS.
More like a blog where anyone can write and "article" and get it published.
One guy used it to bad mouth FR after he got banned for cause.
The Washington Examiner is actually a conservative leaning tabloid which just last month went from a daily newspaper to a weekly one.
Beck sounded like Alex Jones this morning. I had to turn it off.
I heard the Beck info both Friday and today. This “two Saudi” theory doesn’t square. The 3B status is attached to the Saudi picked up at the bombing. That can’t be reconciled with this story.
At least one of the conservative talkers viciously attacked Beck today. I was listening to Medved who called Beck (not by name but obvious who he was talking about) a self interested bloviating poser for bringing this up.
Not taking sides myself but watching with interest.
The advertisers are happy. He got you to watch, watch nothing. If you don’t understand that, you’re being played.
I thought Beck said he would disclose something so big that it would change the way we look at government?? All hype, no pop.
Beck said on Friday that of all the stories over the 50 years the bombshell he was about to drop would rate Number 2 or possibly number one (paraphrasing from the video). well the bombshell has been delivered and don’t even see a FR breaking thread.
Beck is an emotional blow-hard who exaggerates thus he has no credibility. It’s a shame because his heart and idealogy are in the right place.
examiner.com is not The Washington Examiner
Let's test that out.