Posted on 04/22/2013 3:16:46 PM PDT by RDangerfield
On April 19th, Glenn Beck accused the United States government of conducting a widespread coverup regarding Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi, a Saudi national who was injured during the Boston Marathon bombing, and promised that, on Monday, he would reveal information he had allegedly obtained that revealed Alharbi "was a very bad, bad, bad man," which he threatened to reveal on Monday unless the government came clean first.
Beck has since made good on his promise and claimed that the NTC issued an event file calling for Alharbi's deportation using section 212, 3B which is proven terrorist activity.
"We are not sure who actually tagged him as a ’212 3B,’ but we know it is very difficult to charge someone with this — it has to be almost certain," said Beck. "It is the equivalent in civil society of charging someone with premeditated murder and seeking the death penalty — it is not thrown around lightly." ... There's just one problem: Alharbi and the Saudi national who was called for deportation are two different people.
Representative Jeff Duncan (R-SC), whom The Blaze credited as possessing the original event file, already asked the DHS Secretary, Janet Napolitano, about the Saudi national during a hearing last Thursday. Napolitano stated that she was "unaware of anyone who is being deported for national security concerns at all related to Boston."
According to DHS officials, the other individual is already in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody.
Furthermore, the other Saudi national was only reported to have been detained for being in violation of his visa, with no mention of 212 3B given at all. According to DHS officials, his case and the Boston Marathon are unrelated.
This is not some new revelation. It was information that was all freely available to Beck.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
Have a nice day. :)
Looks like you’re ignorant on my ignorance too.
See ya.
it’s that ever present ego..Edging God Out, for ones one attention. So so common in many people. fhu.com has the other way...if you haven’t heard?
RE: Whatever the case may be, this government owes the people of this country a detailed, truthful and immediate explanation of exactly what is going on here, because right now it looks like they are covering for Saudi terrorists.
Actually, no it doesn’t. Reporters and researchers were puzzled by Beck’s claim that this young man, Alharbi, was on a most-wanted terrorist list. Except that he is not, as they discovered. What they discovered is that his surname is very common in the region with thousands of people related to that clan. So they checked and they found that sure enough, there are a number of Alharbis on various terrorist lists and at Gitmo, but none of them are this man. Either Beck or the congressmen or his researchers or whoever fed him the material apparently did not look behind the similar name. Check out the list if you need convincing.
Many from Al-Harbi’s clan are entrenched in terrorism and are members of Al-Qaeda as identified by the Islamic governements.
Out of a list of 85 terrorists listed by the Saudi government shows several of Al-Harbi clan to have been active fighters in Al-Qaeda:
#15 Badr Saud Uwaid Al-Awufi Al-Harbi
#73 Muhammad Atiq Uwaid Al-Awufi Al-Harbi
#26 Khalid Salim Uwaid Al-Lahibi Al-Harbi
#29 Raed Abdullah Salem Al-Thahiri Al-Harbi
#43 Abdullah Abdul Rahman Muhammad Al-Harbi (leader)
#60 Fayez Ghuneim Humeid Al-Hijri Al-Harbi
Source: http://aalhameed1.net/vb/showthread.php?t=1565
Then you have Al-Harbi clan members in Gitmo:
Salim Salman Awadallah Al-Sai’di Al-Harbi
Majid Abdullah Hussein Al-Harbi
Muhammad Abdullah Saqr Al-Alawi Al-Harbi
Ghanem Abdul Rahman Ghanem Al-Harbi
Muhammad Atiq Uwaid Al-Awfi Al-Harbi
Source: http://www.muslm.net/vb/showthread.php?169019-
Imagine of his name was Tommy Thompson. See the point?
The event filehad a precise 212 3B designation for the Alharbi GB named. Are you telling us that it is an easy thing to have that 212 3B designation header on such an event file? ... Because it is in fact very specific and requires very extensive sign offs by more than one department to have that designation.
Yes, I do see the point. However, I am not satisfied at this point, although I am willing to consider that it is a mistake.
I will need to know why he was there, and then set to be deported, or if there was confused identities, why?
Having a common name is not good enough in a situation such as this. Also, who did Obama meet with from Saudi Arabia and why?
I am still suspicious, though I am willing to consider other possible explanations.
Chris,
1) This young man is not being deported.
2) As several news stories point out, both the president and the first lady visited the injured at several hospitals, not just this one man. There is zero evidence that Michelle Obama or the president specifically went to the hospital to visit this man.
Obama has many things to answer for. But Beck’s “most important revelation in his career” is turning out not to be one of them.
If that is the case, then that is the case, and I am sure that Beck will say so, because he has stated that he is interested in truth and being correct.
So if he is incorrect, I expect he will say so.
That remains to be seen, there is no way for me to know for sure one way or the other at this time, but I’m sure I’ll know son enough.
It is.
examiner.com is not The Washington Examiner
Good point. I was trying to compliment the Washington Examiner, but sure enough this is a different site. My apologies. I did not mean to mislead.
I didn’t realize we were in debt to the Saudis, but I guess we pay late for the oil we buy from them.
Truth be told, they are in debt to US, not us to them.
IIRC, the USA was invited to almost all oil producing countries in the Mideast and south America also.
And we went in and made them profitable oil producers with the stipulation that we would have a stake in the oilfields and the profit.
Most all of those that “used” us...and they DID use us...reneged on their promises and nationalized the oil business and cut the USA out all together.
Good idea to give an ultimatum to Saudi Arabia.
We should have gotten oil from Iraq to pay for all the money we spent liberating them.
The “war for oil” mantra of the left for over a decade was insane...we didn’t get oil from any of the war efforts.
The problem with out country now is that it is being run by people that have NO idea how to efficiently do it.
Plus of course they have their own agendas, such as pushing muslim prominence all over the world.
We could, in a year probably, be energy sufficient with out Saudi oil with pipelines, more drilling and less...MUCH less draconian restrictions.
Drill near the shore, it will keep the oil from seeping out of the ocean floor and causing it to deposit on the sand at the shore and get our economy rolling again.
The only thing stopping us from getting on the right track is politics.
Getting the oil flowing, from everywhere including shale etc will create millions of jobs and help the economy tremendously.
LOL my turn to think aloud, hay you made some good points thanks!
Har!
Thanks Jane, I wasn't able to listen.
You betcha! Drill baby drill! LOL
As can be seen by posts on this thread, there is plenty of demand for Saudi oil even if we cut back a little at a time until we no longer need it.
China, India...many countries are upping their consumption of oil products constantly.
Let the Saudis sell their oil to them.
Without the flow of oil, trucks do not deliver foods, etc. tot(sic) he inner cities.... So don’t expect America ot (sic) ever allow open drilling. The opposite seems top(sic) be the future.Your statements don't make sense. If the US started producing more oil with less restrictions to the point where we needed less Saudi oil it would still be moved by trucks and pipelines across the country.
The Saudis would have plenty of other markets if we pulled back from buying their oil
And we could produce all we need, supplemented by Canada oil through the pipeline which Obama and the leftists are blocking for no reason except for politics and the fact that Obama is the buttboy of Saudi princes.
We need to take the future out of the hands of the leftists and give it back to the citizens!
Well then, let me try again. Those who have run inflation to the no return point, where America cannot possibly repay it all while spending insanely, have a vested interest in resetting the system, rather than allow US to struggle along reducing our debt and working to become self-sufficient. because these oligarchs use the federal reserve to keep Americans enslaved to the ever rising debt, these same oligarchs will collapse the system rather than allow US to oust them for self-sufficiency. when they collpase the economy, refineries will not be trucking resupply fuel to riot torn cities. Trucks will not be trucking in food and supplies to the same chaotic sites. Mass chaos serves the purpose of reset. It has always been the way the money lender oligarchs do the reset. war and pestilence make them richer and more powerful in the world whimpering from the disatsers.
I appreciate your posts on this topic. I’ve come across other ones and you always hit the nail on the head.
It amazes me that anyone who listened, watched or read this information could just laugh it off as some silly act by Beck.
By God, if our brightest here can’t see the truth, we really are sunk.
Impressive list there RD, I wonder, can you or any of those reporters tell us which one of those names has the EXACT same DOB, same schooling, same EXACT assigned alien number?
When you get that answer, do let us know.
btw, do you really really really believe this media and this administration is going to tell us the truth about this guy? Really??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.