A well written comment. If the police need that firepower, so do all citizens.
1 posted on
04/20/2013 6:23:03 AM PDT by
marktwain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: marktwain
How did the bombers exchange gunfire with police in a city and state with very strict gun laws? Surely bombers don’t violate gun laws do they?
2 posted on
04/20/2013 6:25:48 AM PDT by
csmusaret
(America is more divided today , not because of the problems we face but because of Obama's solutions)
To: marktwain
Great question. How many rounds do cops REALLY NEED to kill one person? Why didn’t they use smaller clips? They could have just reloaded, if really necessary?
No, the ONLY REASON they had such large clips was to inflict maximum violence on innocent people. They were only looking for one person - if they can’t hit him with a seven round clip, then they need more training..
3 posted on
04/20/2013 6:26:42 AM PDT by
BobL
(Look up "CSCOPE" if you want to see something really scary)
To: marktwain
Why didn’t they just send one police officer?
Or seven, if that’s the number we want to settle one.
Seven officers with seven rounds apiece.
Seems more than fair.
To: marktwain
Who “needs” 30 round Magazines? Guys that can’t find sixty round mags?
5 posted on
04/20/2013 6:33:13 AM PDT by
count-your-change
(you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
To: marktwain
Absolutely...We're still defenseless...They have armoured vehicles.
And terrorists ??? All they need is a backpack and a pressure cooker.
If you saw the guy in your backyard and you were armed, would you shoot or call 9-11?
To: marktwain
It's a good bet that many MA anti-gun types, while being ordered to hunker down behind locked doors, had a change of heart about the value of being armed.
9 posted on
04/20/2013 6:37:42 AM PDT by
JPG
(Stay strong.)
To: marktwain
I do! — I hate loading 5 rds over and over...it saves me x 6...
10 posted on
04/20/2013 6:37:59 AM PDT by
BCW
(I'm searching for John Galt)
To: marktwain
11 posted on
04/20/2013 6:39:52 AM PDT by
BCW
(I'm searching for John Galt)
To: marktwain
I have been pondering this same thought.
What if I say: “Boy I’m glad those citizens have 30-round mags and Assault Rifles!”
And they say, “They aren’t citizens, they are police.”
Well, I contend that the police ARE citizens.
(And so am I!}
13 posted on
04/20/2013 6:44:45 AM PDT by
Scrambler Bob
( Concerning bo -- that refers to the president. If I capitalize it, I mean the dog.)
To: marktwain
14 posted on
04/20/2013 6:46:22 AM PDT by
y6162
To: marktwain
I have multiple weapons from .22s, 9mms to a WASR10 w/30 round magazine. The night they were chasing these guys around the neighborhood, if I was in my house, guess which one I would pick.
17 posted on
04/20/2013 6:50:40 AM PDT by
Starstruck
(Don't rest. We came close to the 2nd Amendment being field tested.)
To: marktwain
In the 1800’s people were allowed to own cannon and really all weapons of war. Gun rights were not the issue of the civil war but the NRA formed to help protect the rights of blacks in the south and have trained millions of civilians and police in gun marksmanship and gun safety. I had NRA hunters safety in High School. We need to be equally armed as criminals and police,FBI,CIA.... The government says the Constitution restricts the government? That is what it was designed for. Watch out for Agenda 21!
20 posted on
04/20/2013 6:55:50 AM PDT by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: marktwain
I do.
My government is facilitating the ability of deadly Islamic terrorists to have free run in my country while at the same time it wages war against its own law abiding citizens.
I need 30 round magazines.
22 posted on
04/20/2013 7:10:05 AM PDT by
chris37
(Heartless.)
To: marktwain
When someone asks how many rounds I need, I tell them I need one more round than whoever is shooting at me. Whatever it takes to protect myself. We can’t count on the criminal to follow the rules when it comes to gun laws.
23 posted on
04/20/2013 7:13:07 AM PDT by
Apple Blossom
(Politicians are like diapers, they both need changed regularly, and for the same reason.)
To: marktwain
>>wonder how many are full-auto?
I would think all were selective fire.
To: marktwain
They say the 2nd amendment is the last defense against tyranny.......no way with the firearms restrictions on citizens.
25 posted on
04/20/2013 7:23:13 AM PDT by
kenmcg
(scapegoat)
To: marktwain
Why do Harry and Nancy plus the rest of that heard of buffoons need to be driven around in a two ton SUV? Couldn’t they get from point A to point B just as easily in a in a Cooper mini?
To: marktwain
Looking at the pics coming in from the Boston bomber manhunt I see all these LEOs bristling with high-capacity-mag, assault weapon looking rifles (wonder how many are full-auto?), bad-ass shotguns, scary black pistols. The police need assault weapons & 30-round clips magazines because they're at war.
I'll let you figure out who they're at war with....
27 posted on
04/20/2013 7:28:39 AM PDT by
kiryandil
(turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
To: marktwain
28 posted on
04/20/2013 7:50:11 AM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: marktwain
29 posted on
04/20/2013 7:54:50 AM PDT by
smokingfrog
( ==> sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson