Birther columns are suppressed

First, though, I’d like to suggest that anyone reading this column in a local newspaper or news site pat the editor on the back for publishing what in our neo-medieval world of fear amounts to a “forbidden” column.

I am about to say something about the Great Barack Obama Identity/Eligibility Scandal again. This is an urgent topic that doesn’t see the light of day in certain so-called news outlets — and I say that from the experience of watching my own syndicated columns fail to appear when covering news of the White House press conference where the president’s long-form birth certificate was unveiled, courtroom proceedings on Obama’s ballot eligibility, and news of (Arizona) Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s investigators presenting evidence Obama’s online birth certificate is a forgery.

I refer to something radio host Sean Hannity said on his show this week. He was speaking in rebuttal to a Democrat arguing that racism was a problem among conservatives. As evidence, the Democrat brought up the “birther issue” — the label used to encapsulate any topic related to Obama’s identity documents and constitutional eligibility.

Erroneously, it is a label that narrowly connotes, and derisively so, only the belief that President Obama wasn’t born in the United States. In fact, the whereabouts of Obama’s nativity is in no way the main bone of “birther” contention, despite the blinkered focus on it by the enforcers of silence.

Of far greater concern to me, for starters, is the purportedly original documentation President Obama belatedly provided the American people to attest to his identity.

I refer to the electronic image of a long-form 1961 Hawaiian birth certificate posted at the White House website. After studying various evidence and demonstrations...

“I vividly recall when Obama stepped before the lectern and proclaimed the computer generated BC to be his authentic document. I immediately knew that moment was history in the making because for the first time Obama ‘owned’ the fraudulent document.”

See my comment posted on Jonathan Turley’s recent blog comparing Barry to Nixon:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3000983/posts?page=27#27

“How Nixon Won Watergate”

Tuesday, March 26, 2013 9:30:24 PM · 27 of 28
Seizethecarp to neverdem

Whoever is moderating Turley’s blog has let a comment by me stay up on the blog:

Seizethecarp 1, March 26, 2013 at 11:44 am

Would now be a good time, Professor Turley, to take another look at the evidence that President Obama has also been dishonest about the authenticity of his birth certificate pdf image that he “released” to the press, but not to any plaintiff in any court?

Here is local Arizona CBS coverage of Sheriff Arpaio’s presser which has been suppressed, IMO by the cult of personality running the national media (aided by intimidation in some cases, I suspect, such as Fox News):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xh37rWmUL9Q

Here is Arpaio’s full presser from March 1, 2012. (Reportedly Arpaio has accumulated additional federally certified forensic document laboratory confirmation of the forgery and is awaiting congressional support for a select committee investigation.):

http://www.westernjournalism.com/sheriff-joe-arpaio-march-31-press-conference-full-video/

Note that on the White House’s own website the transcript of the BC “release” event shows Dan Pfeiffer and Bob Bauer exhibiting obvious “plausible deniability” tactics as well as “consciousness of guilt” behavior:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carney-4272011

Q And this is going to sound — I mean, you can just anticipate what people are going to — remain unconvinced. They’re going to say that this is just a photocopy of a piece of paper, you could have typed anything in there. Will the actual certificate be on display or viewable at any — (laughter.)

Q Will the President be holding it?

MR. PFEIFFER: He will not, and I will not leave it here for him to do so. But it will — the State Department of Health in Hawaii will obviously attest that that is a — what they have on file. As Bob said, it’s in a book in Hawaii.

MR. BAUER: And you’ll see the letter from the director of the Health Department that states that she oversaw the copy and is attesting to –

Q But do you understand that this could quiet the conspiracy theorists?

MR. PFEIFFER: There will always be some selection of people who will believe something, and that’s not the issue.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.