I don't either. So then why release it. No one knew Sybrina had it. It's not addressed to her. This could have easily been dropped in the round file or filed away and it would have never been missed.
So why dredge it up and dredge it up now at a time when Witness 8 is about to be unmasked???
Bernardo coughed up the letter the same day that O'Mara was scheduled to depose Witness 8. I think Bernardo was covering the contingency of O'Mara asking Witness 8 if she ever wrote down her recollection, and any follow up questions.
In my unhappy experience, subpoena’s commonly require the witness to bring and produce at the depo all relevant documents in their possession. Sounds like the defense got it at Sybrina’s 3-15-13 depo, from Sybrina. On 3-27-13, BdlR provided it as discovery material, AS IF, he also had first received it recently, and already provided it once on 3-15-13. Question is, when did the State really first have it?