In my unhappy experience, subpoena’s commonly require the witness to bring and produce at the depo all relevant documents in their possession. Sounds like the defense got it at Sybrina’s 3-15-13 depo, from Sybrina. On 3-27-13, BdlR provided it as discovery material, AS IF, he also had first received it recently, and already provided it once on 3-15-13. Question is, when did the State really first have it?
O’Mara says it was produced to him by the state, on March 13th this year, just before the deposition with Witness 8. De la Rionda refuses to tell the defense when the state received the evidence.