Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion

Does anyone know how the Witness Protection Program create new BCs? Certainly they aren’t this sloppy. You’d think if the government workers who do this work have it down pat so that’s another red flag that hussein and his handlers didn’t use those workers but did this on their own and most certainly it wasn’t approved by the real American government.


20 posted on 03/28/2013 8:57:21 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bgill

The HI statute doesn’t say who creates the new BC but I’m pretty sure it’s the HDOH itself who does, because they are the ones who would have the old documents to use for C&P, authority to issue the BC#’s, etc.

We’ll get to it later in this series, but there are 2 different levels of sloppiness in the White House image.

There is the sloppiness of what the HDOH sent Obama: misalignment, kerning, TXE, smiley face, etc.

And there is the sloppiness of the White House having to clean up what the HDOH had put in that was totally unacceptable for their purposes. That is why they had to do the layers. I suspect that the layers were used to take out stuff that the HDOH put in that didn’t work for the lie. For instance, a screwy last digit in the BC#, as a red flag. Dates with digits in a different font. Stanley Ann Dunham’s signature. Those are all things that required the different layers.

The seal is found on the same layer as the cross-hatch background. But the cross-hatch background did not come from the HDOH; it doesn’t have the necessary skew in the lines. The White House had to create the cross-hatch design with a very light “seal” on it, and use that as one layer. So there may have been something screwy with the seal, and/or a new background layer had to be made to hide the ALTERED and LATE stamps on the BC the HDOH sent.

As we’ve seen with the Sunahara death certificate, which was only done by the HDOH. Witness protection programs are not authorized in HI statute to alter DEATH certificates. And obviously there is no need to protect somebody who has already died. Those red flags were put in by the HDOH itself.

I believe the sloppiness was deliberate, in all these instances.

I believe it was deliberately sloppy because Alvin Onaka knew that it was unlawful. Because that provision only applies for somebody who was born in Hawaii, and Onaka cannot verify that Obama was born in Hawaii, as he made clear in the letter of verification for AZ SOS Ken Bennett.


25 posted on 03/28/2013 9:53:33 AM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson